How to test for gender bias in RNA seq experiment ?
1
0
Entering edit mode
2.0 years ago
mohsamir2016 ▴ 30

Dear All, I performed an RNA seq experiment comparing virus-infected animals vs control animals. The goal is to see how these two animal groups would differ in gene expression. I realized that infected animals were of 13 male + 11 female and in the control animals: 15 male , 16 female. As you know sex chromosome could have genes that bias the analyses. How can I test if this gender variation between the two groups could bias the analyses, so could shift somehow the expression of some gene towards one sex. I performed chi-square to test association and it was non significant. Any ideas

program R • 935 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

if you have used DESeq2/EdgeR, include sex in model (~ condition+sex). If other variables in experiment are influenced by sex, include interaction in the model.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for the answers. I already created an nMDS. Here I run 3 nMDS:

an nMDS grouping the sex in the control group

an nMDS grouping the sex in the infected group

an nMDS grouping the sex on both control and infected animals together

How do you think is the sepration. I run Permanova to test significant differences among groups (see P-value above the figure). Now which is these figures are best answering the question ? Beacuse I assume looking into each group (e.g. within infected). if male and female seprated then there is a sex bias inside this group, meaning that infection did affects gene expression in a sex-dependent manner ? am I right

I also though about logistic regression analyses as a statitical approach to test this ? how do you think ?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

use DESeq2/EdgeR as suggested and get back to us if you need help

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
2.0 years ago
fracarb8 ★ 1.6k

You could run an initial analysis without accounting for the sex (e.g. ~condition), and look at how your samples split based on few PCs.

If there is a clear difference between the two groups, then you need to account for that variability like cpad0112 suggested (e.g. ~Sex + condition).

PCA_by_Gender

In the figure above, the samples are not splitting by sex, so it should be safe to avoid the correction.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1919 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6