Meta-analysis of gene expression data versus individual dataset analysis
1
1
Entering edit mode
8 weeks ago

Dear all, I hope all of you be fine and healthy

We performed RNA-seq data meta-analysis by the Rankprod (combined p-value) method to find DEGs. Surprisingly, we found some DEGs in meta-genes that did not have significant differential expression in separate study analysis (individual t-test).

Is there any explanation for it?

meta-analysis p-value RNA-seq R • 602 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Not disucssing that standard t-tests and RNA-seq are not a good combination, do you understand what a meta-analysis does and what combining p-values means? Say you have three studies and geneA had a p-value of 0.051 in each of the three. Not significant in each, but what would be the combined p-value, higher or lower? Think about that and then try to answer your question.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for your reply. I do not know much about statistics. I just use the Rankprod method to do a meta-analysis. I used the combined p-value method. That was my question: why were some meta-genes left out of individual study analyses? 

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

You just repeated your question without addressing my comment, I cannot help further it seems.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi

We conducted gene expression meta-analysis with Ranlprod method, too. and there are some genes in the meta-analysis output that was not significant in some of the individual studies. How could we explain it? what is the reason? That was expected variance between samples in each study was less than the variance between different studies and all meta-genes were common with DEGs in each study. how we can describe this result bae on variance change in the expression matrix?

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
8 weeks ago
jv ▴ 740

I haven't done meta differential expression analysis before, but isn't the point of the approach to gain better sensitivity in DEG identification by using results from multiple studies? That's to say, it isn't that surprising that you found additional statistically significant results - even the authors of Rankprod highlight this in their paper.

From what I am seeing in the Rankprob paper the method does not combine p-values, but instead ranks genes by fold change values and performs a permutation test to determine statistical significance.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

I have this question too, I have read the Rankprod paper, but I could not find the highlight. could you please help me to find it?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I have this question too, I have read the Rankprod paper, but I could not find the highlight.

What exactly is your question? Is this for a homework assignment?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

No i just need it for part of my manuscript.

The Challenge is about some additional genes in meta-analysis that were not common in all the studies

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1318 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6