1
vote
3
replies
274
views
1
vote
1
reply
1.4k
views
updated 28 days ago by
xiaoleiusc
▴
120
•
written 3.6 years ago by
mickey_95
▴
100
1
vote
3
replies
273
views
updated 17 days ago by
Ram
41k
•
written 18 days ago by
Confused_human
▴
10
1
vote
2
replies
321
views
updated 14 days ago by
Hongjin
•
0
•
written 8 weeks ago by
mateomejias
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
529
views
1
vote
1
reply
168
views
1
vote
7
replies
587
views
1
vote
1
reply
186
views
1
vote
2
replies
247
views
1
vote
2
replies
281
views
14 days ago by
abedkurdi10
▴
190
1
vote
8
replies
519
views
1
vote
2
replies
261
views
11 days ago by
AS20
▴
10
1
vote
2
replies
413
views
1
vote
1
reply
198
views
updated 13 days ago by
ATpoint
78k
•
written 13 days ago by
dylannicoembros
•
0
1
vote
6
replies
521
views
1
vote
3
replies
2.2k
views
updated 10 days ago by
ayaosama2111
▴
10
•
written 7.1 years ago by
Nicolas Rosewick
10k
1
vote
1
reply
194
views
1
vote
4
replies
304
views
8 days ago by
anasjamshed
▴
120
1
vote
5
replies
331
views
1
vote
3
replies
296
views
1
vote
2
replies
204
views
1
vote
4
replies
412
views
15 days ago by
Daniel
▴
30
1
vote
2
replies
358
views
1
vote
4
replies
377
views
14 days ago by
George
•
0
1
vote
2
replies
210
views
1
vote
6
replies
490
views
1
vote
1
reply
177
views
updated 17 days ago by
shelkmike
★
1.1k
•
written 18 days ago by
1041853545
•
0
1
vote
0
replies
100
views
1
vote
1
reply
200
views
1
vote
4
replies
274
views
1
vote
3
replies
362
views
updated 26 days ago by
rpolicastro
12k
•
written 26 days ago by
Manuel
▴
10
1
vote
0
replies
217
views
18 days ago by
nadammagdy
▴
10
1
vote
4
replies
288
views
1
vote
2
replies
231
views
1
vote
3
replies
269
views
1
vote
6
replies
355
views
1
vote
2
replies
202
views
updated 9 days ago by
WouterDeCoster
47k
•
written 9 days ago by
manaswiniparija3
▴
10
1
vote
1
reply
208
views
26 days ago by
yhdist
▴
70
0
votes
0
replies
125
views
0
votes
0
replies
126
views
0
votes
1
reply
262
views
updated 21 days ago by
jv
★
1.2k
•
written 22 days ago by
hellokwmin
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
130
views
26 days ago by
Carlos
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
83
views
0
votes
0
replies
117
views
0
votes
0
replies
115
views
0
votes
0
replies
72
views
0
votes
0
replies
142
views
27 days ago by
muhammad.akram
▴
10
0
votes
0
replies
106
views
0
votes
5
replies
452
views
0
votes
3
replies
400
views
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
University Park, USA, 3 minutes ago
Thailand, 6 minutes ago
United States, 7 minutes ago
South Korea, 9 minutes ago
India, 12 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
United States, 14 minutes ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
seta
★
1.8k
Popular Question to
endre.sebestyen
▴
10
Popular Question to
beausoleilmo
▴
560
Commentator to
Brian Bushnell
19k
Popular Question to
Gama313
▴
120
Popular Question to
nanodano
▴
30
Recent Replies
Answer: Is bisulfite-seq data from different studies comparable with each other?
by
NextGenSeek
•
0
The efficiency of bisulfite treatment itself can differ significantly, so I would definitely not compare bisulfite-seq data from different …
Answer: Issue with genetic QC sex check
by
kl
▴
10
After setting set-hh-missing, I have the following boxplot, where a F statistic of 0.91 corresponds to a female in my phenotypic dataset wh…
Comment: Bioinformatics
by
ATpoint
78k
Converting data from one to another format and repairing gene names turned dates. Yes, great field.
Comment: Yes .. BBMap can do that! - Part III clumpify (mark (and dedupe) duplicates with
by
GenoMax
136k
Yes that should be true. I will let https://www.biostars.org/u/14684/ confirm.
Comment: From TPM to raw counts
by
Gama313
▴
120
Thanks for the answe and the linkI used bioinfokit tpm formula to calculate tpm from bulk which is the same formula given in your link:
…
Comment: From TPM to raw counts
by
Gama313
▴
120
Thanks Brian for the suggestion. However, I did the whole process, from bulk counts generation, to data transformation and scrna deconvolut…
Answer: Are 10x cellranger-arc ATAC bam files deduplicated?
by
swbarnes2
13k
My experience with regular 10x bam files is that duplicates are not removed, but they are flagged as duplicates. So take a look at the …
Comment: Can I use TCGA-LUAD RNAseq count that had already normalized by RSEM in Limma-vo
by
fluke
•
0
Thanks a lot for your answer, I’m confused between RSEM expected count and RSEM normalized count. I’m working on this dataset from UCSC ht…
Answer: From TPM to raw counts
by
Istvan Albert
99k
In principle, the TPM formula can be reverted, see the timeless post
* [What the FPKM? A review of RNA-Seq expression units][1]
In p…
Comment: Low coverage whole genome sequencing reveal excess heterozygosity for multiple S
by
beausoleilmo
▴
560
You're right, I wasn't explaining the problem clearly. Thanks for the directions!
- The depth; coverage ~3.00X ± 2.50 SD
- The sequen…
Comment: Using metagenome assembly and binning to identify and mitigate contamination in
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
25k
All good points, especially about multiple copies of single-copy genes. I am doing error-correction in my assemblies, but was making an edu…
Comment: Can I use TCGA-LUAD RNAseq count that had already normalized by RSEM in Limma-vo
by
CTLong
▴
20
Yes, normalized RSEM counts from TCGA can be used as input for Limma Voom. Please check this post https://support.bioconductor.org/p/63981/…
Comment: How to obtain data on the coordinates of the Exon region from UCSC
by
ayasu
•
0
Sorry for the delay in expressing my thanks.
I found the advice to look at the information from MySQL very useful.
I will also refer to t…
Comment: From TPM to raw counts
by
Brian Bushnell
19k
I'm posting this as a comment instead of an answer specifically because it's just what I would do and I don't know if it's the best approac…
Comment: Using metagenome assembly and binning to identify and mitigate contamination in
by
Brian Bushnell
19k
In most cases error-correction should take care of error-spawned fake minor alleles, though...
> If you want to convince yourself of this,…
Traffic: 968 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6