should I use normalized counts or transformed of normalized counts for RNA-seq association analysis?
1
0
Entering edit mode
6 months ago
Alewa ▴ 170

Hi,

I run differential gene expression with DeSeq2.

dds <- DESeq(dds)
rld <- rlog(dds, blind=False)
vsdata <- vst(dds, blind=FALSE)

If my goal is to find association between gene expression (RNA-seq ) and methylation, should I use the normalized DESeq object dds or transformed normlaized counts rld / vsdata or the log2FC? previous study use FPKM, RPKM

I'm confused & thanks in advance for your help

methylation DESeq RNA-Seq • 507 views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
6 months ago
Trivas ★ 1.7k

Depending on your study design, I think the best you'll be able to do is say whether the differentially expressed genes from DESeq also have differential methylation patterns from whatever software you're using, grouping it as +/+, +/-, -/+, or -/- as an example. You could also gate either DEGs or methylation status and do a metagene analysis (e.g., histogram of read depth over certain regions). See here for a very simple analysis https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.741415/full#F5

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for the reference!!!!!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1798 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6