GSEA and genes with 0 TPM's
1
0
Entering edit mode
2.1 years ago
didemdkn • 0

Hello everyone,

I have a very basic question which I do not know how to reason it. I conducted a RNA-Seq experiment without replicates (please do not blame me :() and i calculated the fold changes between two conditions (let's say X and Y) using TPM values. Now, I want to find some enriched sets using GSEA. To do that, I need to choose the highest fc values or prerank the fc's.

Here is the question,

Some of the genes have 0 TPM's in condition X and more than 0 in condition Y. I added 0.001 to all the TPM values to calculate fold changes to get rid of the 0 values. However, those genes are looking like they have 8976976 fc (just a huge number). However, they reason they do not have any TPM in one condition can be low coverage, or they were not there in the condition X and started to be expressed in condition Y. How should I treat them while appliying GSEA? Should I omit them or put another filter for them etc.?

Any help is appreciated. Thank you for your help!

GSEA RNA-Seq • 776 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

What strategy did you finally apply?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
2.1 years ago
Soheil ▴ 110

When we have replicates we usually filter out all the genes with low counts (say less than 10) across all samples but here it wouldn't really make sense. As you figured yourself, without any replicates you can't really tell if a gene or pathway is up/down-regulated. To be more precise, without replicates it is not clear whether the difference between test and control is just by chance or statistically significant. Finally, I think a single-sample enrichment analysis (ssGSEA or ssGSVA) would be a better option here. Yet you won't be able to tell if the difference observed between control and test is statistically significant.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2622 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6