41 minutes ago by
Info-rggs
▴
20
0
votes
0
replies
9
views
0
votes
1
reply
21
views
updated just now by
bk11
★
3.0k
•
written 1 hour ago by
Varun Gupta
★
1.3k
0
votes
1
reply
33
views
819
votes
169
replies
155k
views
110 follow
updated 16 days ago by
Biostar
3.0k
•
written 7.8 years ago by
Istvan Albert
101k
0
votes
1
reply
25
views
7
votes
13
replies
627
views
5
votes
9
replies
7.5k
views
0
votes
2
replies
91
views
updated 5 hours ago by
kalavattam
▴
270
•
written 8 hours ago by
Muhammad
•
0
2
votes
3
replies
155
views
0
votes
2
replies
273
views
0
votes
0
replies
53
views
2
votes
1
reply
81
views
0
votes
1
reply
100
views
updated 12 hours ago by
yura.grabovska
▴
430
•
written 16 hours ago by
odi
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
91
views
1
vote
1
reply
114
views
0
votes
0
replies
68
views
2
votes
0
replies
94
views
18 hours ago by
bitsofadventures
▴
20
0
votes
0
replies
76
views
updated 16 hours ago by
GenoMax
146k
•
written 19 hours ago by
psuazosoto
•
0
8
votes
8
replies
4.1k
views
7 follow
updated 16 hours ago by
GenoMax
146k
•
written 5.8 years ago by
endrebak852
▴
110
0
votes
2
replies
119
views
1
vote
4
replies
209
views
0
votes
0
replies
96
views
1
vote
1
reply
122
views
updated 11 hours ago by
DGTool
▴
250
•
written 1 day ago by
diogo.moraes
▴
20
1
vote
1
reply
161
views
updated 1 day ago by
Jeremy Leipzig
22k
•
written 1 day ago by
Crypto
▴
10
2
votes
3
replies
1.8k
views
2
votes
5
replies
1.4k
views
updated 4 hours ago by
i.sudbery
20k
•
written 2.7 years ago by
lluc.cabus
▴
20
0
votes
0
replies
73
views
updated 21 hours ago by
Ram
44k
•
written 1 day ago by
debocolman
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
137
views
updated 1 day ago by
Jordan M Eizenga
▴
620
•
written 1 day ago by
guntul
▴
30
1
vote
2
replies
151
views
0
votes
0
replies
84
views
2
votes
1
reply
127
views
0
votes
0
replies
92
views
1 day ago by
Mitmischer
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
131
views
updated 1 day ago by
zx8754
12k
•
written 1 day ago by
adarsh_munna
▴
50
1
vote
2
replies
170
views
0
votes
3
replies
191
views
1
vote
0
replies
116
views
2
votes
4
replies
346
views
6
votes
24
replies
967
views
0
votes
3
replies
312
views
updated 1 day ago by
Mensur Dlakic
★
28k
•
written 1 day ago by
aackermann287
•
0
0
votes
5
replies
262
views
1 day ago by
ChumBucket2024
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
102
views
3
votes
4
replies
303
views
updated 1 day ago by
Pierre Lindenbaum
164k
•
written 2 days ago by
Qiong
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
145
views
0
votes
0
replies
119
views
0
votes
0
replies
102
views
0
votes
1
reply
191
views
0
votes
0
replies
100
views
updated 2 days ago by
Ram
44k
•
written 2 days ago by
carlopecoraro2
★
2.6k
0
votes
2
replies
153
views
updated 2 days ago by
andres.firrincieli
3.7k
•
written 2 days ago by
Julián
•
0
6
votes
6
replies
296
views
1 day ago by
MaxMin
▴
10
1
vote
4
replies
218
views
updated 2 days ago by
Pierre Lindenbaum
164k
•
written 2 days ago by
Jan
•
0
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
United States, 1 minute ago
United States, 1 minute ago
United States, 6 minutes ago
Stony Brook University, NY, 6 minutes ago
United States, 7 minutes ago
United States, 8 minutes ago
United States, 8 minutes ago
Recent Awards •
All
Great Question to
Info-rggs
▴
20
Popular Question to
zizigolu
★
4.3k
Popular Question to
Chris
▴
340
Popular Question to
upasana
▴
20
Popular Question to
diogo.moraes
▴
20
Appreciated to
xanderpico
▴
580
Recent Replies
Comment: Dealing with 2 different layers of counts within RNA assay in seurat
by
bk11
★
3.0k
Please do check how you can remove a layer or subset of layer from a Seurat Object in the following link:
[Seurat v5 Command Cheat Sheet][…
Comment: DESEQ with time series data on mutant vs. wild-type?
by
swbarnes2
14k
Yes, if you want to compare one subgroup to a second subgroup, do it this way. You can make the same comparison with the interaction desig…
Comment: Proxy Variant SNP for PRS
by
Sam
★
4.8k
Have you tried performing imputation on your target data?
Comment: DESEQ with time series data on mutant vs. wild-type?
by
Megan
▴
20
Here is an updated photo. I was given this data from my PI, where there were three biological replicates each for the samples. I had to rem…
Comment: DESEQ with time series data on mutant vs. wild-type?
by
swbarnes2
14k
You should add condition to this plot. If the subclusters match with condition, this isn't so bad.
Though only 10 samples? 5 v 5 would h…
Comment: Understanding IGV
by
GenoMax
146k
Why are there more than one screenshot if you are referring to a specific location? Which of the shots is supposed to be the location (you …
Comment: HTseq count issue, not aligning to features
by
boone5jones
•
0
Thank you for your help. I appreciate it.
Comment: bcftools/vt split multiallelics - split GT along with splitting multi-allelics
by
Ram
44k
You're absolutely right - I lost sight of that.
I'm working with cancer cells, so polyploidy is a possibility. Is there any way to address…
Comment: VCF filter by read depth
by
Ram
44k
It's no inconvenience, I was just clarifying what your goal is here. You can use `bcftools view` to filter using read-depth. You should use…
Comment: GATK "We encountered a non-standard non-IUPAC base in the provided reference: '1
by
GenoMax
146k
Click here --> https://www.biostars.org/p/162747/#162748
Comment: Combining GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment analysis) and DEG (Differentially Expressed
by
arnaud_p
•
0
Hi old toppic, but I think the question is still of interest.
I'm used to working with RNAseq data, mainly from mouse liver.
Based on my ex…
Answer: DESEQ with time series data on mutant vs. wild-type?
by
Megan
▴
20
It looks like there was an issue with the colData, where the KO was labeled as the WT instead. I corrected it and the fmr1 account is corre…
Answer: DESEQ with time series data on mutant vs. wild-type?
by
Megan
▴
20
Hi Maze,
I had to use this account to response to you. Sorry about that. I made a PCA plot with both samples and this is what I got. I …
Comment: GATK "We encountered a non-standard non-IUPAC base in the provided reference: '1
by
skdv2522
•
0
which command you are talking about
Comment: GATK "We encountered a non-standard non-IUPAC base in the provided reference: '1
by
skdv2522
•
0
9:42:57.242 INFO PairHMM - Total compute time in PairHMM computeLogLikelihoods() : 0.0
19:42:57.242 INFO SmithWatermanAligner - Total co…
Traffic: 1569 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6