User: volkansevim
volkansevim • 10
- Reputation:
- 10
- Status:
- New User
- Location:
- Bay Area
- Last seen:
- 4 years, 10 months ago
- Joined:
- 5 years, 5 months ago
- Email:
- v**********@gmail.com
about me
Posts by volkansevim
<prev
• 5 results •
page 1 of 1 •
next >
0
votes
4
answers
3.8k
views
4
answers
Comment:
C: Pindel Somatic Calls?
... I'm interested in your filter. How can I get it?
...
written 4.9 years ago by
volkansevim • 10
0
votes
0
answers
1.2k
views
0
answers
... I've got a dataset with normal and two tumor samples (from the same tumor) for each patient. Let's call those n, t1, and t2. I want to compare insertions and deletions in t1 to those in t2. Is it advisable to run Pindel using directly t1 and t2, i.e., use t1 as normal sample? The alternative is to r ...
written 4.9 years ago by
volkansevim • 10
• updated
4.7 years ago by
Biostar ♦♦ 20
0
votes
2
answers
1.1k
views
2
answers
... Hi Kai. Thanks a lot for your response. I'm using version 0.2.5a3, Oct 24 2013.
...
written 4.9 years ago by
volkansevim • 10
3
votes
2
answers
1.1k
views
2
answers
... The SUM_MS field in Pindel output files is the sum of mapping qualities of the anchor reads. Is this the sum of all supporting reads or just the unique reads?
Also, some lines have zero supporting unique reads, but multiple total supporting reads. Below is an example (Supporting=5, UniqueSupporting ...
written 4.9 years ago by
volkansevim • 10
1
vote
1
answer
1.4k
views
1
answer
... I'm running Pindel on some tumor/normal pairs. I noticed that the output contains some overlapping calls as shown below. Start positions of the deletions are the same, but the ends shift by 1bp.
217 D 4 NT 0 ChrID chr1 BP 7828173 7828178 BP_range 7828173 7828 ...
written 4.9 years ago by
volkansevim • 10
• updated
2.8 years ago by
Biostar ♦♦ 20
Latest awards to volkansevim
No awards yet. Soon to come :-)
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User
Agreement
and Privacy
Policy.
Powered by Biostar
version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1937 users visited in the last hour