Question: Ks Saturation After A Pairwise Comparison Analysis Using Codeml
0
gravatar for Juliana Soto
9.3 years ago by
Juliana Soto50
Juliana Soto50 wrote:

Dear all,

I´m doing a pairwise comparison analysis using runmode -2 in the codeml option from the PAML package, and I would like to filter the gene pairs that have a ks (synonymous substitutions) with saturation.

I´m looking in the literature for an upper threshold on values of Ks (to avoid saturation), but I have not been found any value or parameter.

I would like to know your opinion about it.

thanks

best regards

codeml • 3.3k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 9.2 years ago by Casey Bergman18k • written 9.3 years ago by Juliana Soto50
3
gravatar for Casey Bergman
9.3 years ago by
Casey Bergman18k
Athens, GA, USA
Casey Bergman18k wrote:

Ks > 1 implies that all silent sites have been substituted one average more than once. Past this point, actual sequence divergence is a highly dependent on the assumptions of your substitution model. I wouldn't trust anything with Ks>1, but real experts in this area do trust ML estimate of Ks up to 2. Also pay attention to the standard error on your estimate of Ks, if it is as high or higher than your point estimate you are pretty much guessing.

ADD COMMENTlink written 9.3 years ago by Casey Bergman18k

thanks a lot! I looked the SE for each dS and took this as the threshold for saturation as well we decided to take only ks values < 1. I think that this parameter is better than just to accept Ks up to 2.

best regards!

ADD REPLYlink written 9.2 years ago by Juliana Soto50
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 999 users visited in the last hour
_