Question: Metrics for exploring the parameter space of broad domain chip-seq finders?
gravatar for Endre Bakken Stovner
4.0 years ago by
Endre Bakken Stovner880 wrote:

Let us say I have want to use SICER or MACS2 for finding broad domains in ChIP-seq data. These contain plenty of parameters I can tune to change the domains found.

Are there any metrics I can use to see if some parameters perform better than others? Any idea, no matter how seemingly stupid, would be appreciated. If these metrics can be machine inspected so that I can automatically choose parameters that would be preferable, but any suggestions welcome.

chip-seq • 910 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 4.0 years ago by dariober11k • written 4.0 years ago by Endre Bakken Stovner880
gravatar for dariober
4.0 years ago by
WCIP | Glasgow | UK
dariober11k wrote:

This is my answer also to your previous question QC for broad domain chip-seq data?.

At the end of the day, my way of assessing the quality of the ChIP and peak calling is to open ChIP and inputs in IGV and look at a few peaks taken from the high confidence to the lower confidence spectrum. Then check if they "look right". I know, it's subjective, it's not scalable. It sucks.

I was kind of writing a program ( to at least simplify the scanning of peaks since scrolling through IGV can be painfully slow.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 4.0 years ago • written 4.0 years ago by dariober11k

I already starred your repo. Since I use Python, I might go with meta-seq, but great job all the same!

ADD REPLYlink written 4.0 years ago by Endre Bakken Stovner880
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1289 users visited in the last hour