Can Bowtie 0.12.7 Handle Sanger / Illumina 1.9 ?
1
0
Entering edit mode
8.2 years ago
fire_water ▴ 80

Hello. I have a user that needs to use Bowtie 0.12.7 (Yeah, old version. Don't ask.) but the quality score format of our FASTQ files is Sanger / Illumina 1.9. I see this version of Bowtie defaults to:

--phred33-quals    input quals are Phred+33 (default)

My questions are:

  1. Since the FASTQ files are using the most recent quality score format, will this version of Bowtie know how to handle that?

  2. If not, where can I find a command-line version of a FASTQ Groomer, like the one in Galaxy?

I appreciate your help.

alignment • 3.1k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
8.2 years ago
GenoMax 142k

You can use reformat.sh from BBMap to do the Q-score conversions.

Sanger Fastq (phred+33) is the standard Q-score format.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you. Do you recommend I convert the Q-score in this specific case or just feed the FASTQ files directly to Bowtie instead?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Since your Q scores are already in Sanger format no need to convert.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks. My only concern is if Bowtie 0.12.7 encounters a "J" in the quality score, will it know how to convert that? Illumina 1.8+ uses "J" whereas Sanger does not. So not sure what'll happen.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

You can align and see what happens. I have a feeling it might work. There are not going to be many bases with J scores.
If bowtie encounters an error (and you have to use this older version) then you could set those J values to one level lower.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Your feeling was correct! Bowtie 0.12.7 handled two test sequences with quality scores set to all Js. Thanks again for your help :)

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1690 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6