Question: GO enrichment analysis and GO terms mapping biases
0
gravatar for neta.livne88
3.1 years ago by
neta.livne880 wrote:

Hello, I have a gene sets from RNA-Seq for my non classic organism model. I have used BLAST2GO to blast all the sequences and map to them GO term. Then I preformed an enrichment analysis for these comparison, and I'm trying to understand how the algorithm is preforming corrections for cases in the gene ontology is more detailed for certain genes rather then others. obviously if gene x have more detailed ontology than gene y, that would create a bias for terms related to gene x. Any idea? BTW, I have a test tomorrow about this, so quick answers will be very much appreciated :-) Thank you! N.

rna-seq • 881 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.1 years ago by Philipp Bayer6.1k • written 3.1 years ago by neta.livne880

Sorry, I don't really understand.

ADD REPLYlink written 3.1 years ago by LLTommy1.2k
0
gravatar for Philipp Bayer
3.1 years ago by
Philipp Bayer6.1k
Australia/Perth/UWA
Philipp Bayer6.1k wrote:

If I understand correctly, there's a recent paper about this:

http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/04/19/049288.full.pdf

Impact of knowledge accumulation on pathway enrichment analysis by Wadi et al.

We analyzed the evolution of gene annotations over the past seven years and found that the vocabulary of pathways and processes has doubled. This strongly impacts practical analysis of genes: 80% of publications we surveyed in 2015 used outdated software that only captured 20% of pathway enrichments apparent in current annotations.

So yeah, if you use old GO terms, or most of your genes don't map to GO-terms, that will have an impact on your results.

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.1 years ago by Philipp Bayer6.1k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 906 users visited in the last hour