Question: BWA-MEM Vs BWA-ALN
gravatar for SOHAIL
3.1 years ago by
Beijing Institute of Genomics, CAS.
SOHAIL270 wrote:

Hi everyone,

I'm sorry if it is answered anywhere else, I have raw dna-seq paired-end sequence reads data from different libraries of read length for different samples. Ranging from 50-90, 50-101, 50-150 (after quality trimming). In FASTQC check i noticed that about 10% of reads are lesser than 70 bp for each sample.

As BWA-mem is pretty mature now but the bwa docs say that bwa mem is preferable for longer reads ( > 70 bp). and BWA-aln is good for shorter reads, but i guess most of the reads from my library are not shorter.

I want to use one mapping algorithm for consistency reasons.Can i still use bwa-mem ignoring small fraction of smaller read lengths? or i should use BWA-aln ?



alignment next-gen genome • 5.2k views
ADD COMMENTlink written 3.1 years ago by SOHAIL270

bwa-mem could be used for short reads as well, but this blog suggests that bwa-aln performs better for 50bp reads but over all mem has a good accuracy at different mismatch levels. Would it be useful if you align the 10% of the short reads with mem and aln and compare the stats to see if it makes a big difference.

ADD REPLYlink modified 3.1 years ago • written 3.1 years ago by geek_y9.7k

yes, i think i should try to compare..

ADD REPLYlink modified 3.1 years ago • written 3.1 years ago by SOHAIL270
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1323 users visited in the last hour