Salmon libtype - Does it matter?
1
1
Entering edit mode
5.4 years ago
Matthias ▴ 30

Hi,

I was wondering what happens if you have the libtype wrong for Salmon? Or why it requires that you supply it? I wasn't sure if the first read of my paired-end reads was forward (ISF) or reverse (ISR), so I ran it both ways, and the mapping efficiencies were identical between the runs.

Thanks, Matt

Salmon alignment • 3.7k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

It is possible that your data was prepared by an unstranded kit/method. You can verify this by using the infer_experiment.py script from RSeQC as described here.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for the quick answer Rob, I appreciate it.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

You're very welcome :).

ADD REPLY
3
Entering edit mode
5.4 years ago
Rob 5.1k

Hi Matthias,

You can find a description of the behavior you're seeing, and why it's generally expected here. Also, I'll note that if you update to the latest release of Salmon (currently v0.7.0), available here, you can use the A (automatic) library type to have Salmon automatically infer the most-likely library type for you.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2731 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6