Question: Evaluation of PacBio only de novo assembly
1
gravatar for lkw222
3.8 years ago by
lkw22230
lkw22230 wrote:

Does anyone have experience using validation/evaluation methods (other than basic statistics like N50) for a PacBio only de novo assembly? What would you recommend? Note: I don't have multiple assemblies to compare, just want to try to do some validation of a single de novo assembly.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.8 years ago by Rohit1.4k • written 3.8 years ago by lkw22230
1
gravatar for lexnederbragt
3.8 years ago by
lexnederbragt1.2k
Oslo, Norway
lexnederbragt1.2k wrote:

There is not a dedicated tool to do this. What comes to mind is mapping the reads back to the assembly and calling variants, especially structural variants. Tools like PBHoney, Sniffles and the like. The problem is that only looking at one assembly won't tell you much - some structural variants may diploid (if your organism is diploid) rather than assembly errors.

Finally, if you expect a lot of synteny to another genome for which there is a high-quality reference, you can compare your assembly to that reference, e.g. using GenomeRibbon.

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.8 years ago by lexnederbragt1.2k
0
gravatar for Rohit
3.8 years ago by
Rohit1.4k
California
Rohit1.4k wrote:

It would be best to start to see how much of the assembly is actually meaningful through single-copy orthologs comparison. Check out CEGMA or BUSCO.

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.8 years ago by Rohit1.4k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 718 users visited in the last hour