Question: Single-cell cluster : up- vs down-regulated marker genes
gravatar for PR
3 months ago by
PR0 wrote:

Hello All,

I would like to know what the experts feel about defining single-cell clusters using up-regulated versus down-regulated marker genes. There is this general view that down-regulated marker genes are ambiguous (and justifiably so), and hence clusters are much better defined by considering only the up-regulated marker genes compared to the rest of the cells in the data. While I understand the overall reasoning behind this, packages do offer the option of obtaining down-regulated marker genes as well. So, what are the caveats of including down-regulated genes in the list? If any, what are the advantages?

Would really appreciate any replies!


ADD COMMENTlink modified 3 months ago by igor6.2k • written 3 months ago by PR0
gravatar for igor
3 months ago by
United States
igor6.2k wrote:

Clusters are generally defined by all the genes (or variable genes to be more precise). However, people usually only look at the up-regulated genes because those are easier to interpret. A gene present in only one cluster can serve as a good marker. Cell types are generally described by their markers. For example, CD79a is a B-cell marker. If you see it expressed in a population, you are likely looking at B-cells. However, if you don't see it, it's not particularly helpful.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3 months ago • written 3 months ago by igor6.2k

Thanks a lot for your response, Igor. That helps!

ADD REPLYlink modified 3 months ago • written 3 months ago by PR0
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1623 users visited in the last hour