Question: Single-cell cluster : up- vs down-regulated marker genes
gravatar for PR
13 days ago by
PR0 wrote:

Hello All,

I would like to know what the experts feel about defining single-cell clusters using up-regulated versus down-regulated marker genes. There is this general view that down-regulated marker genes are ambiguous (and justifiably so), and hence clusters are much better defined by considering only the up-regulated marker genes compared to the rest of the cells in the data. While I understand the overall reasoning behind this, packages do offer the option of obtaining down-regulated marker genes as well. So, what are the caveats of including down-regulated genes in the list? If any, what are the advantages?

Would really appreciate any replies!


ADD COMMENTlink modified 13 days ago by igor5.4k • written 13 days ago by PR0
gravatar for igor
13 days ago by
United States
igor5.4k wrote:

Clusters are generally defined by all the genes (or variable genes to be more precise). However, people usually only look at the up-regulated genes because those are easier to interpret. A gene present in only one cluster can serve as a good marker. Cell types are generally described by their markers. For example, CD79a is a B-cell marker. If you see it expressed in a population, you are likely looking at B-cells. However, if you don't see it, it's not particularly helpful.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 13 days ago • written 13 days ago by igor5.4k

Thanks a lot for your response, Igor. That helps!

ADD REPLYlink modified 13 days ago • written 13 days ago by PR0
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1828 users visited in the last hour