Question: Single-cell cluster : up- vs down-regulated marker genes
gravatar for PR
3.0 years ago by
PR30 wrote:

Hello All,

I would like to know what the experts feel about defining single-cell clusters using up-regulated versus down-regulated marker genes. There is this general view that down-regulated marker genes are ambiguous (and justifiably so), and hence clusters are much better defined by considering only the up-regulated marker genes compared to the rest of the cells in the data. While I understand the overall reasoning behind this, packages do offer the option of obtaining down-regulated marker genes as well. So, what are the caveats of including down-regulated genes in the list? If any, what are the advantages?

Would really appreciate any replies!


ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.0 years ago by igor12k • written 3.0 years ago by PR30
gravatar for igor
3.0 years ago by
United States
igor12k wrote:

Clusters are generally defined by all the genes (or variable genes to be more precise). However, people usually only look at the up-regulated genes because those are easier to interpret. A gene present in only one cluster can serve as a good marker. Cell types are generally described by their markers. For example, CD79a is a B-cell marker. If you see it expressed in a population, you are likely looking at B-cells. However, if you don't see it, it's not particularly helpful.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.0 years ago • written 3.0 years ago by igor12k

Thanks a lot for your response, Igor. That helps!

ADD REPLYlink modified 3.0 years ago • written 3.0 years ago by PR30
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 2340 users visited in the last hour