Question: Mutect2 somatic hemizygote variant on chrX
0
gravatar for cocchi.e89
4 weeks ago by
cocchi.e8980
cocchi.e8980 wrote:

I am working on calling some somatic variants from WES samples, I followed step-by-step the GATK guidelines. This is not a tumor sample so I don't compare the exome with another but with a multisaples panel-of-normals. Basically at the end of all filterings etc. you got a VCF file with PASS on likely somatic variants.

I got this result in an hemizygotic variant on chromosome X X-107865086-G-A:

X   107865086   .   G   A   .   PASS    CONTQ=93;DP=31;ECNT=1;GERMQ=65;MBQ=0,34;MFRL=0,166;MMQ=60,60;MPOS=19;POPAF=7.30;ROQ=93;SEQQ=93;STRANDQ=93;TLOD=99.53    GT:AD:AF:DP:F1R2:F2R1:SB    0/1:0,31:0.970:31:0,15:0,16:0,0,18,13

I noticed that this variant was called by GATK Haplotypecaller too, and is an hemizygosis on a male patient in chrX. How is that possible that this variant is considered somatic by all the Mutect2 pipeline?? I don't think a VAF of 97% can ever be somatic....

Thank you very much in advance for any help!

ADD COMMENTlink written 4 weeks ago by cocchi.e8980

I don't think a VAF of 97% can ever be somatic

Maybe not likely, but certainly possible. In this case, if this is a male, then you only have one chrX.

ADD REPLYlink modified 4 weeks ago • written 4 weeks ago by igor11k

Yes sorry Igor, I meant not really likely

ADD REPLYlink written 4 weeks ago by cocchi.e8980
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1715 users visited in the last hour