Mutect2 somatic hemizygote variant on chrX
0
0
Entering edit mode
12 months ago
cocchi.e89 ▴ 150

I am working on calling some somatic variants from WES samples, I followed step-by-step the GATK guidelines. This is not a tumor sample so I don't compare the exome with another but with a multisaples panel-of-normals. Basically at the end of all filterings etc. you got a VCF file with PASS on likely somatic variants.

I got this result in an hemizygotic variant on chromosome X X-107865086-G-A:

X   107865086   .   G   A   .   PASS    CONTQ=93;DP=31;ECNT=1;GERMQ=65;MBQ=0,34;MFRL=0,166;MMQ=60,60;MPOS=19;POPAF=7.30;ROQ=93;SEQQ=93;STRANDQ=93;TLOD=99.53    GT:AD:AF:DP:F1R2:F2R1:SB    0/1:0,31:0.970:31:0,15:0,16:0,0,18,13

I noticed that this variant was called by GATK Haplotypecaller too, and is an hemizygosis on a male patient in chrX. How is that possible that this variant is considered somatic by all the Mutect2 pipeline?? I don't think a VAF of 97% can ever be somatic....

Thank you very much in advance for any help!

mutect2 gatk somatic chromosome-X hemizygosis • 371 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

I don't think a VAF of 97% can ever be somatic

Maybe not likely, but certainly possible. In this case, if this is a male, then you only have one chrX.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Yes sorry Igor, I meant not really likely

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2282 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6