Question: What is the appropriate method for clustering a small number of cells?
0
gravatar for david.f.stein
5 months ago by
david.f.stein10 wrote:

I have a count matrix of single cell data with 122 cells. I am trying to process it with the standard Seurat workflow, however, the UMAP reduction is yielding strange results. Basically, no clusters are forming. I'm wondering if ~100 cells is too low for UMAP. Does anyone know what might be going on here? I can provide my code if necessary

Edit: I found if I raise the "resolution" argument in the "FindClusters" function then clusters are picked up. I'll have to read more about what the "resolution" means in this context.

rna-seq next-gen genome gene • 170 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 5 months ago • written 5 months ago by david.f.stein10

Did you try "pca" instead of "umap" ?

ADD REPLYlink written 5 months ago by geek_y11k

I ran PCA, TSNE, and UMAP. None seem to result in clusters on visualization

ADD REPLYlink written 5 months ago by david.f.stein10

It might be biological then. Did you check what are the top variable genes using function like rowVars ?

ADD REPLYlink written 5 months ago by geek_y11k

I did, finding variable features seemed to work as usual/expected. Is there something I should be looking for in particular? I just saw on a github issue on the Seurat repository that graphical clustering tends to perform poorly for around <100 cells, so maybe I'm just out of luck

ADD REPLYlink written 5 months ago by david.f.stein10
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1748 users visited in the last hour