Deconvolution of bulk RNA sequencing PBMC: different results for different methods
Entering edit mode
24 months ago
MatStat ▴ 150

Hi all,

I am running deconvolution on a PBMC bulk RNA sequencing data in R. The problem is that I get very different results when using different methods: quantiseq CIBERSORT EPIC ABIS

Besides EPIC it seems that most methods are having difficulty characterizing the cells fractions. I would expect that a well established method would be able to recognize a PBMC data and therefor I won't have a large fraction of cells which are uncharacterized when using appropriate reference matrix.

How can I tell which method yields the best result?

Does anyone have an experience with one of the methods on PBMC/in general?

All the best

quantiseq cibersort epic ABIS Deconvolution • 885 views

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1225 users visited in the last hour
Help About
Access RSS

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6