Which pipeline is the best for differentinal gene expression analysis (edgeR, DESEQ2 or HISAT2 - stringtie - ballgown)?
1
0
Entering edit mode
3.5 years ago
sunnykevin97 ▴ 980

HI, I may asking a naive question, to clarify myself. Which RNA_seq pipeline considered to be the best for model and non-model organisms ? I used edgeR earlier, find it very easy. Can some one explain, which pipeline is the best edgeR, DESEQ2 or HISAT2 - StringTie - Ballgown How to select these tools on what criteria ? Some simple answers.

RNA-Seq • 2.0k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
3.5 years ago

It'll strongly depend on your data. If you have a good genome of reference (e.g. human) and you are interested in to study differential transcript usage and discover new potential isoforms, the best idea is Hisat2-StringTie-Ballgown. If you are only interested in study differential gene expression and potential implications like GO enrichment and KEGG, use Rsubread and edgeR is the best option (time and computation resources consuming with strong statistical backup).

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks,I'm working with non-model organism, only primary genome assembly (26 replicons) available currently. I'm interested only in the differential gene expression analysis. I started with TRINITY,HISAT2,featurecounts,edgeR,GO,KEGG.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Trinity is a transcriptome de novo assembler... Do you really need that if you have got a genome of reference?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I don't have alternate assembly, the non-model organism I'm working.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

It may be easier use salmon + edgeR afeter the assembly and annotation (Trinity-Trinotate)

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1352 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6