Gene- Level Go Enrichment Analysis- with annotation on transcript-level
1
0
Entering edit mode
3.5 years ago
biosjm • 0

Hello, I have a question regarding GO enrichment analysis: I`ve identified DEG by Deseq2 and would like to perform a GO enrichment analysis with topgo or similar for this set of data. I have an annotated transcriptome from Trinotate, but it contains the go term information for several transcripts from one gene. According to the vignette of Topgo I have to prepare a list o the gene id and respective go terms. My question are now:

a) Do I map now all the go terms of all transcripts from one gene together?

b) Do I have to de-duplicate, if always the same go terms occur between the transcripts within one gene?

gene / transcripts / GO

1 / 1a / GO:123, GO:456, GO:987

1 / 1b / GO:123, GO: 000

1 / 1c / GO:123, GO: 456

--> prepare list (in case of b) Is this right?

gene / GO

1 / GO:123, GO:456, GO: 987, GO:000

Thank you for any comment or link to clarify this!

rna-seq topgo go enrichment analysis • 1.1k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
3.5 years ago

a) Yes unless you have reasons to want to distinguish between different products of a gene.
b) It can't hurt to ensure there are no duplicates (it probably doesn't matter but without looking at the implementation, I can't be sure). You can't have duplicated genes.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you for your answer! I agree with you that it might not be a good idea to have duplicated genes as input for topgo. I was wondering, if I have to keep duplicated go terms for one gene : gene / GO 1 / GO:123, GO:456, GO:987, GO:123, GO: 000, GO:123, GO: 456

or I have to de duplicate the terms as above in b)

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

To clarify, my answer to b was that I don't know if duplicated GO terms are an issue but that removing duplicates doesn't cost you anything. I added the warning about duplicated genes because not only is it not a good idea, topGO would throw an error.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you for your help!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1646 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6