Question: miRDeep2 microRNA detection - inconsistent predictions between samples
0
gravatar for lauren.todd
9 weeks ago by
lauren.todd0 wrote:

I am using miRDeep2 to detect novel miRNAs in a species that miRNAs have not been studied in before. The program itself is running fine, but I am getting inconsistent results between my different samples (all replicates of each other, just different libraries). For example, in library 1, miRDeep2 might predict 9 miRNAs (the genome is very small so I don't expect too too many). But then when I run the script on library 2, maybe only 6 are identified, and of those maybe only 3 were also predicted from library 1. The weird thing is, when I take a miRNA only detected in one library, I can find reads (like thousands of them) exactly matching that sequence in the other library where it wasn't predicted. So my questions is, why would a miRNA be predicted from one library and not the other when reads corresponding to its sequence are abundantly found (at roughly equal counts) in both libraries??

Hopefully this makes sense. I am using default miRDeep2 parameters - I didn't feel providing the code would help here as its more of a conceptual question.

Additionally, when I run miRDeep2 analysis on both libraries together (by providing a config.txt file), I get even LESS miRNAs predicted overall than I would if predicting from one library alone. Why might this be?

Thanks for your help in advance! I'm very new to bioinformatics so any help is appreciated.

mirdeep2 microrna • 137 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 9 weeks ago by lauren.todd0
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1620 users visited in the last hour
_