Why Doesn'T Cufflinks Recognize The Gene Names When Using The -G Option
0
1
Entering edit mode
11.0 years ago
le456900 ▴ 40

Dear, When use cufflinks, I encounter a big problem. If use “cufflinks –G”, it not assemble any novel genes and isoforms. But “cufflinks –g” also encounter problem. The result shows as follow:

 55 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "2"; FP
 56 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "3"; FP
 57 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "4"; FP
 58 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "5"; FP
 59 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "6"; FP
 60 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "7"; FP
 61 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "8"; FP
 62 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "9"; FP
 63 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "10"; F
 64 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "11"; F
 65 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "12"; F
 66 309     -       .       gene_id "CUFF.2"; transcript_id "NM_015155"; exon_number "13"; F

I want know why it recognize the “transcript_id”, while doesn’t know “gene_id”.

A big problem is that the cuffdiff output is also confusion. It show as follow: 『gene_exp.diff』 1509 XLOC_001508 XLOC_001508 RERE chr1:8492712-8493573 q1 q2 OK
1510 XLOC_001509 XLOC_001509 RERE chr1:8494713-8494999 q1 q2 OK
1511 XLOC_001510 XLOC_001510 RERE chr1:8503067-8503472 q1 q2 OK
1512 XLOC_001511 XLOC_001511 RERE chr1:8505909-8506863 q1 q2 OK
1513 XLOC_001512 XLOC_001512 RERE chr1:8506981-8508284 q1 q2 OK
1514 XLOC_001513 XLOC_001513 RERE chr1:8515100-8515631 q1 q2 OK
1515 XLOC_001514 XLOC_001514 RERE chr1:8530511-8531476 q1 q2 OK
1516 XLOC_001515 XLOC_001515 RERE chr1:8531644-8532531 q1 q2 OK
1517 XLOC_001516 XLOC_001516 RERE chr1:8539576-8540626 q1 q2 OK
1518 XLOC_001517 XLOC_001517 RERE chr1:8555242-8555810 q1 q2 OK
1519 XLOC_001518 XLOC_001518 RERE chr1:8564935-8565810 q1 q2 OK
1520 XLOC_001519 XLOC_001519 RERE chr1:8567281-8567763 q1 q2 OK
1521 XLOC_001520 XLOC_001520 RERE chr1:8571715-8572103 q1 q2 OK
1522 XLOC_001521 XLOC_001521 RERE chr1:8588952-8589191 q1 q2 OK
1523 XLOC_001522 XLOC_001522 RERE chr1:8589400-8589863 q1 q2 OK
1524 XLOC_001523 XLOC_001523 RERE chr1:8589926-8590744 q1 q2 OK
1525 XLOC_001524 XLOC_001524 RERE chr1:8599237-8600354 q1 q2 OK
1526 XLOC_001525 XLOC_001525 RERE chr1:8605236-8605710 q1 q2 OK
1527 XLOC_001526 XLOC_001526 RERE chr1:8605782-8605992 q1 q2 OK

It is the gene_exp.diff (not isoform_exp.diff), the same gene is separated to so many lines. I also used cufflinks in Galaxy and get the same results. I don’t find a solution, so I seek help from your, thanks.

cufflinks • 2.6k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2627 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6