Deseq2 Result
0
0
Entering edit mode
2.5 years ago
Diango • 0

I use Deseq2 to perform differential gene expression analysis. I have successively changed the LFC, i.e.LFC > 1.5 and LFC > 2 as shown in the following code:

dds_ALL <- DESeq(dds_ALL)
GNF_D6_vs_GNF_WT =results(dds_ALL,contrast = c("genotype","TreatedD6","TreatedWT"),lfcThreshold = 1,alpha = 0.05)
summary(GNF_D6_vs_GNF_WT,rm.na = TRUE)
head(GNF_D6_vs_GNF_WT)

 treshlod <- GNF_D6_vs_GNF_WT$padj < 0.05 & abs(GNF_D6_vs_GNF_WT$log2FoldChange) >1

 GNF_D6_vs_GNF_WT$treshlod<-treshlod
sig_D6WT <- data.frame(subset(GNF_D6_vs_GNF_WT,treshlod==TRUE))
write.csv(sig_D6WT , 
          file="TreatedD6_vs_TreatedWT.csv")

 write.csv(rownames(sig_D6WT) , 
          file="TreatedD6_vs_TreatedWT_ID.csv",row.names = FALSE)

When I keep the LFC > 1.5, all the groups of genes that have for example a LFC = 3, I expect to see the same genes when I put the LFC to 2 and with the same value of LFC, But however I notice a slight variation of the LFC of these genes instead of 3 they come back to 2.8. So I would like to know if this variation is due to the Deseq2 algorithm or due to my code?

Thank you

Transcriptomics RNA-Seq Deseq2 • 955 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Take a look at the answer of Michael Love respect to this point in Bioconductor. Also, I suggest you to read the manuscript mentioned there in order to understand what DESeq2 is doing when estimates the lfc.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you rodolfo.peacewalker.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2900 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6