ZMW s above all thresholds was 0% after lima primer removal
1
0
Entering edit mode
3.0 years ago
wzw0029 • 0

I used lima to remove primer from my Isoseq data , and got the summary:

ZMWs input                (A) : 768300
ZMWs above all thresholds (B) : 18 (0%)
ZMWs below any threshold  (C) : 768282 (100%)

ZMW marginals for (C):
Below min length              : 14 (0%)
Below min score               : 0 (0%)
Below min end score           : 251313 (33%)
Below min passes              : 31 (0%)
Below min score lead          : 0 (0%)
Below min ref span            : 700907 (91%)
Without SMRTbell adapter      : 31 (0%)
Undesired 5p--5p pairs        : 25887 (3%)
Undesired 3p--3p pairs        : 685276 (89%)
Undesired no hit              : 31 (0%)

ZMWs for (B):
With different pair           : 18 (100%)
Coefficient of correlation    : 0%

ZMWs for (A):
Allow diff pair               : 768269 (100%)
Allow same pair               : 768269 (100%)

Reads for (B):
Above length                  : 18 (100%)
Below length                  : 0 (0%)

my command:

 lima --isoseq -j 20 3d-F1-ccs.bam primers.fasta 3d-F1-lima.bam
primers.fasta
>primer_5p
AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTACATGGGG
>primer_3p
AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTAC

what happened? Thank you!

lima summary isoseq • 954 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

I have the same problem, has it been solved?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
20 months ago
JZX • 0

Okay, I seem to understand something. I converted my ccs.bam to ccs.fastq, founding the primers were different from the values I put in Lima. When I changed the primers.fasta file and rerun Lima, everything became normal.

Make sure enter the correct FASTA file.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1554 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6