recommend gene ranking methods when doing GSEA
1
0
Entering edit mode
4 months ago

Dear guys,

Do you recommend to use t to rank gene or log2FC or sign(log2FC) * -log10(Pvalue) to rank gene?

The fgsea use t to rank the gene. fgsea rank gene Rscript

While when looking the distribution of the DEGs, t is similar to log2FC, but different from the others like Pvalue, adj.Pvalue, etc.

Aslo, when looking at the results from GSEA, it seems Pvalue is more mentationed, while not using adjusted-P value?

enter image description here

Gene_rank GSEA • 389 views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
4 months ago

I tend to use shrunken log fold changes from e.g. DESeq2 to reduce the prevalence of genes with high log fold differences but very low expression. Log fold change is also a more direct measurment of effect size compared to p-value so intuitively made more sense for GSEA.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you very much for sharing for very nice valuable experience! Appreciate it a lot!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1752 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6