freebayes on nanopore reads
1
0
Entering edit mode
12 weeks ago
Nodilan ▴ 10

Good morning ,

I have my reads generated using nanopore technology , I already know that there is Medaka, Nanopolish and Clair ( correct if I'm wrong please) but can I use freebayes to detect variants ???

many thanks !!

freebayes nanopore • 554 views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

Use one of the workflows at Epi2ME if it fits your user case: https://labs.epi2me.io/wfindex/

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

thank you but besides this , can I use freebayes ?

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode

While you can use any program keep in mind its originally intended application. If a program uses assumptions that don't fit the data then you could end up with incorrect results. Have you checked the overview section for freebayes: https://github.com/freebayes/freebayes

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
12 weeks ago

Generally freebayes is a good, robust tool for SNP calling. It requires a lot of downstream filtering by QUAL etc to get good SNP sets though. That is, it focuses on sensitivity, not specificity, so outputs many potential variants.

If you have older reads - eg ONT 9.4.1 - then you will need to do far more quality filtering than the newer Kit14 ONT 10.4.1 datasets.

I would look at longshot as well as it is easy and fast and can output phased SNPs. It is also designed for Nanopore.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

thank you Sir,

when you say "then you will need to do far more quality filtering than the newer Kit14 ONT 10.4.1 datasets" does it mean that I have to filter my vcf file based on QUAL column ??

what do you recommand as tool in order to visualize if I have a good variant quality or not ? in other words how would I know which quality value I have to setup ?

thanks !! :)

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2655 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6