Question: Filter MuTect before running MutSig?
gravatar for simonjean434
4.2 years ago by
simonjean43450 wrote:

Hello all,


should we filter (clean) the somatic variants called by MuTect before running MutSig?

if yes, which filtering criteria you apply?




mutsig • 1.8k views
ADD COMMENTlink written 4.2 years ago by simonjean43450

What do you mean by filtering somatic variants before mutsig? Are asking about removing synonymous and intronic variants ? Or removing false positive variants ?

ADD REPLYlink written 4.2 years ago by poisonAlien2.7k

Thanks for your reply. Actually, both! also should we remove alternative variants with low coverage?

ADD REPLYlink written 4.2 years ago by simonjean43450

It's always good to remove low coverage variants since it improves the estimated vaf. Also given MuTect detects lot of subclonal mutations with low vaf's, it is desirable to choose those with reliable depth.  And for second, MutSig only considers variants which affect the structure/fucntion of the protein (non-synonymous), to pick out drivers. So it should not affect the analysis much. Infact if you are working on liquid tumors (such as AML) where mutation rate is low (8-10 per sample), it is good to include those tier 2 and tier 3 mutations, just to improve the statistics behind MutSig.

You can check this for effect of coverage on vafs and variant consideration.

ADD REPLYlink modified 4.2 years ago • written 4.2 years ago by poisonAlien2.7k

Thank you for your help!

ADD REPLYlink written 4.1 years ago by simonjean43450
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1859 users visited in the last hour