Question: Fastq Format Problem When Using Bwa Aln -Q Option (Read Trim)
1
gravatar for Bioscientist
8.2 years ago by
Bioscientist1.7k
Bioscientist1.7k wrote:

This is kind of follow-up question of http://biostar.stackexchange.com/questions/14723/trim-the-low-quality-end-of-100bp-read

My paired-end reads are 100bp, and in Illumina 1.5+ format. Now I need to run like:

bwa aln -q 20

I'm just wondering do I need to first convert Illumina 1.5+ format to Sanger format? Or simply set -q 46 ? (Since Sanger format is phred+33; while Ilumina 1.5+ is phred+64)

Actually I'm a little bit confused about Sanger, Illumina 1.3, Illumina 1.5. What are these? Where do they come from?

Thanks

Edit: I just notice bwa aln has an "I" option, which converts Illumina 1.3 to sanger. But what about Illumina 1.5? Can it be applied to 1.5?

trimming quality bwa • 3.3k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 8.2 years ago by Damian Kao15k • written 8.2 years ago by Bioscientist1.7k
1
gravatar for Damian Kao
8.2 years ago by
Damian Kao15k
USA
Damian Kao15k wrote:

Here is a good thread on seqanswers about converting Illumina to Sanger quality scores.

Here is a good description of what the quality scores are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format#Quality

ADD COMMENTlink modified 4 months ago by RamRS25k • written 8.2 years ago by Damian Kao15k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1124 users visited in the last hour