Illumina 450k Annotation Definitions/Articles: How was "Enhancer" status determined?
0
2
Entering edit mode
8.8 years ago
maden.sean ▴ 20

I work in a clinical research studying global methylation in normal and cancer tissue using the Illumina 450k array.

My question is pretty straightforward: I am looking for resources (i.e., documentation, articles, etc.) that detail how the probe annotations have been derived for the manifests/annotation files available.

I am interested in specific experiments and procedures used to come up with these annotations. In particular, I would like to know how Enhancer status was defined (what assay(s) were used? How was it determined these regions were associated with the listed gene?).

In case it is helpful, I have been using the manifest implemented in the Bioconductor package minfi.

Cheers,
Sean

UPDATE 7/7/15: An Illumina rep pointed me to a handy bulletin on the Illumina website with details on the annotation. It says Enhancer status is determined informatically by Encode, however it is still not clear which track(s) correspond to what was used. Also it would be great to find a reference to the specific algorithm(s) in question. S

UPDATE 7/715 #2: Kasper Hansen has replied to my question on Bioconductor forums: https://support.bioconductor.org/p/69586/

next-gen genome R • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 3148 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6