Question: ITS1/2 primers for fungal endophytes in trees
gravatar for User 4014
4.8 years ago by
User 401440
User 401440 wrote:



I want to look at diversity of fungal endophytes in trees using MiSeq. I tried a couple of primer pairs targeting either ITS1 or ITS2 e.g., ITS1F/ITS2, ITS3_KYO2/ITS4, ITS3_KYO2/ITS4_KYO3 (Toju et al., 2012) and BITSf/B58S3R (Bokulich and Mills, 2013), but none of them returned a satisfied result. All of the primers  amplified a relatively large portion of trees ITS1/2.

Do you have any suggestions which primer pair I should try on, or any method I can try to reduce amplification of trees ITS?

Thank you in advance and have a great day!




ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.4 years ago • written 4.8 years ago by User 401440

Hello User 4014,

I am at a similar position to you, when you wrote this post. Did you ever settle on an optimal primer set and if so, would you mind sharing them with me ?

Thanks : )

ADD REPLYlink written 3.4 years ago by emericklarkin0
gravatar for User 4014
3.4 years ago by
User 401440
User 401440 wrote:

Hi there!

I ended up with BITSf/B58S3R, but it doesn't mean the primer pair is good for you. My recommendation is that go to NBCI, download ITS sequence(s) of your tree host(s), align them if needed, blast primers of your interest to the ITS sequence(s), and choose the one with many mismatches to the host ITS as possible. From my experience, some of the primers mentioned above match perfectly with my host species. And despite using the primer pair with 2-3 mismatches, you will still get host ITS to some extent ...

I hope this helps. Good luck!

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.4 years ago by User 401440
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1609 users visited in the last hour