Question: Disadvantage of RNA-seq compared with Microarray?
gravatar for z991ace
4.9 years ago by
z991ace0 wrote:

I am working on cancer related gene expression data from RNA-seq(RPKM). What I want to do is finding some important gene from gene expression data set, such as genes highly related to tumor recurrence.

But I found that still most of paper working on this kind of research used data set from Microarray, instead of RNA-seq. It has been long time since RNA-seq introduced, and as I know, RNA-seq data is generally less noisy than that of Microarray. Also, now it seems to be enough(although much less than Microarray) RNA-seq data is available, at least for tumor analysis.

Is there any other reason for using Microarray instead of RNA-seq? Are there some critical cons in using RNA-seq gene expression data?

rna-seq microarray • 3.5k views
ADD COMMENTlink written 4.9 years ago by z991ace0

I think RNA-Seq still costs more per sample that microarrays. Choosing method for identifying differentially expressed genes can be a bit of a hassle as well - see this article for more details.

ADD REPLYlink modified 10 months ago by RamRS30k • written 4.9 years ago by mkulecka320

Sorry for insufficient question. I just meant the step 'analysing data', which do not need to consider about the cost. There are many RNA-seq tumor-related gene expression data publicly available, most data of analysis is based on microarray even recently. I think it is better to use 'less noisy' data for analysis if the number of samples are sufficient for test. I wonder whether there are some points to make RNA-seq data analysis difficult.

ADD REPLYlink modified 10 months ago by RamRS30k • written 4.9 years ago by z991ace0
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 723 users visited in the last hour