Hi !
I'm currently working with paired-end RNA-Seq data from an oriented library (fr-stranded firststrand) of Salmonella enterica. Within this context, I'm performing some analysis with a tool developed in my lab that uses XS-strand attribute that TopHat adds in BAM files. It is known that Tophat is not designed to work on bacteria and returns poorer mapping results than Bowtie2 or STAR on those organisms (so far, my observations confirm this fact : ~65% uniquely mapped read with TopHat, ~80% to ~84% with Bowtie and STAR. Each time, the intron length was set to 0 or 1; because I suppose there is no intron in Salmonella, it's a bacteria).
My goal is to reproduce TopHat's XS-Strand attribute with a post treatment on a Bowtie/STAR mapping. I thought TopHat was using the SAM-Flag present in the second column of SAM/BAM files to guess the XS-Strand. To be sure, I ran the following command line:
grep -Po '\t[0-9]+\t.*XS:A:[\+\-]' accepted_hits.sam | awk '{print $1"\t"$NF}' | sort -n | uniq -c
Where accepted_hits.sam is the result of my TopHat run.
The following lines are an extract of the proportion of SAM-flags the previous command line returned:
NB Reads | SAM-Flag | XS-Strand attribute
   262102  81         XS:A:+
       59  81         XS:A:-
 11563221  99         XS:A:-
     1150  99         XS:A:+
 11562241  147        XS:A:-
     2130  147        XS:A:+
      251  163        XS:A:-
  9854904  163        XS:A:+
A read with a 99 SAM-Flag has the following characteristics (according to [1]): read paired, read mapped in proper pair, mate reverse strand, first in pair. I thought this SAM-Flag would refer to a + Stranded read ... But TopHat does not agree (11,563,221 times!). Notwithstanding this remark, a read with a 147 SAM-Flag has the following characteristics (according to [1]): read paired, read mapped in proper pair, read reverse strand, second in pair. I totally agree with the XS-Strand attribute predominant group, the read is on the - strand.
To be sure, I opened my BAM files with two genome viewers (Artemis and IGV) and had a look at my data. Both Genome viewers displayed the read orientation I was waiting for, and not the one TopHat wrote in its' 99s-XS-Strand attributes.
Here is a summary of my questions:
- With TopHat, one SAM flag can lead to both XS-Strand attributes (with a large predominance of one on the other). How is that possible?
 - The predominant TopHat's XS-Strand-attribute group and the information given by the Broad Institute seems (sometime) contradictory. Which one should I trust?
 
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Many thanks in advance for your help !
PS : Here are the first lines of the accepted_hits.bam (obtained with: samtools view -h accepted_hits.bam | head). There is also my TopHat command line.
@HD    VN:1.0    SO:coordinate
@SQ    SN:gi|378697983|ref|NC_016810.1|    LN:4878012
@PG    ID:TopHat    VN:2.0.9    CL:/usr/bin/tophat -p 5 -o ./Output_Salmonella/ --library-type fr-firststrand Index/salmonella.fasta_ref fastq/Salmonella_R1_egal.fastq fastq/Salmonella_R2_egal.fastq --min-intron-length 0 --max-intron-length 1
NS500446:4:H18FBBGXX:1:23206:24124:12692    153    gi|378697983|ref|NC_016810.1|    3    50    150M    *    0    0    AGATTACGTCAGGTTGCAAGAGATCATGACAGGGGGAATTGGTTGAAAATAAATATATCGCCAGCAGCTCATGAACAAGTTTCGGAATGTGATCAATTTAAAAATTTATTGACTTAGGCGGGCAGATACTTTAACCAATATAGGAATACA    FFFF7FFFFF.7FFAFFF<FFF<F.F.FF7FFFFFFF.AFAFFF7FF<F77F<FF.<<F7F7FFAFFF)FF<FF7<FFFFFF)FF7FFFFFFFAFFFF.F)FFFAA.FAFFFAFAFFFAFFFFFFFFFFFF7F)F<FFFFAFFFFAAAAA    AS:i:-5    XN:i:0    XM:i:2    XO:i:0    XG:i:0    NM:i:2    MD:Z:10T57A81    YT:Z:UU    NH:i:1    XS:A:-
NS500446:4:H18FBBGXX:2:21104:23648:17357    153    gi|378697983|ref|NC_016810.1|    3    50    150M    *    0    0    AGATTACGTCAGGTTGCAAGAGATCATGACAGGGGGAATTGGTTGAAAATAAATATATCGCCAGCAGCACATGAACAAGTTTCGGAATGTGATCAATTTAAAAATTTATTGACTTAGGCGGGCAGATACTTTAACCAATATAGGAATACA    FF<..AA)AF7FF)7FFFAFFFFFFFFFFF<F7<<<FFF<FFFF.AFAF<FAFA<.FAF7FFFAFFFFFFF.FFFF7FFFFFAFFFF<.F.FFFFFAA.FFAFFF7)FFAFFFFFFFFF<FFFFFFFFFFF7FFFF7F.F<FF.FAAAAA    AS:i:-4    XN:i:0    XM:i:1    XO:i:0    XG:i:0    NM:i:1    MD:Z:10T139    YT:Z:UU    NH:i:1    XS:A:-
NS500446:4:H18FBBGXX:1:12106:15808:8809    99    gi|378697983|ref|NC_016810.1|    4    50    30M1D120M    =    39    185    GATTACGTCTGGTTGCAAGAGATCATGACAGGGGAATTGGTTGAAAATAAATATATCGCCAGCAGCACATGAACAAGTTTCGGAATGTGATCAATTTAAAAATTTATTGACTTAGGCGGGCAGATACTTTAACCAATATAGGAATACAAG    <AAAAFFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFAFFFAFFFFFFFFF7FFFFF<FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAAFFFFFFFFFFF<FFAFFFFAFAFFFFFFF<FAFFF.FFFFFFFFAFF<<<A.F.FFAFF<F77F    AS:i:-8    XN:i:0    XM:i:0    XO:i:1    XG:i:1    NM:i:1    MD:Z:30^G120    YT:Z:UU    NH:i:1    XS:A:-
NS500446:4:H18FBBGXX:1:12303:25690:20081    73    gi|378697983|ref|NC_016810.1|    4    50    150M    *    0    0    GATTACGTCTGGTTGCAAGAGATCATGACAGGGGGATTTGGTTGAAAATAAATATATCGCCAGCAGCACATGAACAAGTTTCGGAATGTGATCAATTTAAAATTTTATTGACTTAGGCGGGCAGATACTTTAACCAATATAGGAATACAA    <<AAAFFF7.FAFFFFAFFFF7FFFFFA.AFAFFFF.F.FFFF.FF<.A.<FAFAF)FFF)A7FFFFFFAFFFFA<FF.F<A7FFFFFFAAFF..AFF<.A.<AFFFAF7FFF<.F.A)<.F7.<FF)FA<F.F77FFF7<.FA)F<7.<    AS:i:-7    XN:i:0    XM:i:2    XO:i:0    XG:i:0    NM:i:2    MD:Z:36A65A47    YT:Z:UU    NH:i:1    XS:A:-
NS500446:4:H18FBBGXX:1:21202:15191:18222    99    gi|378697983|ref|NC_016810.1|    4    50    150M    =    58    204    GATTACGTCTGGTTGCAAGAGATCATGACAGGGGGAATTGGTTGAAAATAAATATATCGCCAGCAGCACATGAACAAGTTTCGGAATGTGATCAATTTAAAAATTTATTGACTTAGGCGGGCAGATACTTTAACCAATATAGGAATACAA    AAAAAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFAFFFFFAAFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFFAFFF<FFFAFFAFFFFFFFFFFF<FFFAFFFAFFFFFFFF.AFFA7FFFFFFFAFFFFFFFAFFAFAFF7AFFFFFFFFFFF.<F)F7FFA.FAF7F    AS:i:0    XN:i:0    XM:i:0    XO:i:0    XG:i:0    NM:i:0    MD:Z:150    YT:Z:UU    NH:i:1    XS:A:-
NS500446:4:H18FBBGXX:1:21302:7977:17040    99    gi|378697983|ref|NC_016810.1|    4    50    150M    =    75    221    GATTACGTCTGGTTGCAAGAGATCATGACAGGGGGAATTGGTTGAAAATAAATATATCGCCAGCAGCACATGAACAAGTTTCGGAATGTGATCAATTTAAAAATTTATTGACTTAGGCGGGCAGATACTTTAACCAATATAGGAATACAA    <AAAAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFFFFFAFFF.FFFFFFFFAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF<AFFFFFFAFFFFFFFFF<FFFF.F<FAFF<7FFFFFF7FFFFA<FF7FFFFAFFFF<<F.AF7F.FF<AFFF.A    AS:i:0    XN:i:0    XM:i:0    XO:i:0    XG:i:0    NM:i:0    MD:Z:150    YT:Z:UU    NH:i:1    XS:A:-
NS500446:4:H18FBBGXX:1:23312:4327:17892    99    gi|378697983|ref|NC_016810.1|    4    50    150M    =    75    221    GATTACGTCTGGTTGCAAGAGATCATGACAGGGGGAATTGGTTGAAAATAAATATATCGCCAGCAGCACATGAACAAGTTTCGGAATGTGATCAATTTAAAAATTTATTGACTTAGGCGGGCAGATACTTTAACCAATATAGGAATACAA    AAAAAFFFFFFFFFF.AFFAFAF<)FFA<AFAFFFF7FFFFFFFFFAFFAFFFFAFFFF7F)FFAFFAFFFFFFAAFFFF<FFFFFFFFFFF<.F.FF.FFFFF<AFA.FFF<FFFFF.F.F.F<FFFF.FFAFF..F7F.<FFFAF<FA    AS:i:0    XN:i:0    XM:i:0    XO:i:0    XG:i:0    NM:i:0    MD:Z:150    YT:Z:UU    NH:i:1    XS:A:-
Here is a document about SAM-Flag interpretation I have found online. I mostly agree with the information given in this image:
