Question: Isoforms with opposite read counts and reverse complement sequences
1
gravatar for davidfishy
2.9 years ago by
davidfishy10
davidfishy10 wrote:

Hi, I am new to RNAseq and not a bioinformatician so please take my apologies if these are basic questions. After mRNA Illumina PE sequencing of 6 brain tissue samples (3 test, 3 controls), de novo assembly with Trinity and DEG with bowtie2 we got: 1. a high number of very similar contigs (putative isoforms). Strangely, in each cluster of isoforms some contigs would be significantly differentially expressed in one direction while other contigs would be significantly differentially expressed in the opposite direction. I don't understand how this is possible. Having more than 90% similarity, often >99%, and assuming reads that map perfectly multiple times are distributed randomly, shouldn't read counts between very similar contigs also be similar? The end result is that at the pathway analysis step we end up with DEG showing, simultaneously, up and down regulation (as a consequence of opposite counts for isoforms that have the same functional annotation). 2. a significant number of reverse complement sequences. In this case the counts are similar and point in the same direction. However, I don't understand how these reverse complement sequences end up in the unigene list

bowtie2 deg next-gen illumina • 773 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 2.9 years ago by davidfishy10
1

Since you are creating a de novo assembly I assume you are not working on an individual with a known reference genome?

ADD REPLYlink modified 2.9 years ago • written 2.9 years ago by WouterDeCoster38k

Yes, it is a de novo assembly without a reference genome

ADD REPLYlink written 2.9 years ago by davidfishy10
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1663 users visited in the last hour