Dear all,
please would you advise, based on your experience, which algorithm is more reliable in confidently calling INDELS in cancer genomes (I am referring especially to INDELS of length > 50bp, let's say 50bp-500bp long).
many thanks,
-- bogdan
Dear all,
please would you advise, based on your experience, which algorithm is more reliable in confidently calling INDELS in cancer genomes (I am referring especially to INDELS of length > 50bp, let's say 50bp-500bp long).
many thanks,
-- bogdan
pindel can do it but, when you get near to the 500bp mark, are you not then in the realm of small somatic copy number alterations? BBMap can also do this: detect large indels
In all cases, read length and insert size are obviously key.
Kevin
LUMPY and Manta do well in this range, provided you have sequencing coverage around the relevant breakpoints.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Thank you Kevin. I have been inspecting cgpPINDEL : https://github.com/cancerit/cgpPindel, as they provide also a docker container. Please would you let me know : is cgpPINDEL largely equivalent to PINDEL ? Thanks !
Replied above!