Question: shift direction in ATAC/DNase data?
gravatar for star
23 months ago by
star240 wrote:

I have two set of data about ATAC-seq and DNase-seq and I like to perform peak calling using MACS2, but I found that there are some differences in shift size (plus or minus direction). I like to know which one is better for either ATAC-seq or DNase-seq (e.g. --nomodel --shift -100 --extsize 200 or --nomodel --shift 100 --extsize 200). is it right that because most accessible regions in ATAC-seq and DNase-seq located in 5' region so using --shift -100 is recommended?

ADD COMMENTlink modified 23 months ago • written 23 months ago by star240
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1399 users visited in the last hour