Question: WGCNA-consensus network analysis using RNA-seq data
gravatar for pixie@bioinfo
8 months ago by
pixie@bioinfo1.4k wrote:

Hello, I have raw read counts from various stress conditions (4 types) from the same RNA-seq platform and tissue. I had previously determined the DEGs from the individual stresses separately and also extracted their normalized expression matrix for each of the stress conditions .

If I wish to perform a consensus module analysis using the WGCNA frame-work, do I need to perform 'vst' normalization in DeSeq2 across all the conditions ? Any leads to go about it will be very useful. Thanks

rna-seq • 674 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 8 months ago by andrew.j.skelton735.7k • written 8 months ago by pixie@bioinfo1.4k
gravatar for andrew.j.skelton73
8 months ago by
andrew.j.skelton735.7k wrote:

For use in WGCNA, your data should be log2-like, so vst or rlog transformations are appropriate. Alternatively, you could use Limma Voom too for RNAseq data.

ADD COMMENTlink written 8 months ago by andrew.j.skelton735.7k

Thanks, my only concern was that by merging all the samples of all the conditions in one matrix, am I diluting the any information. But after going through their tutorial, they have possibly done that (i.e. normalized across male and female data)

ADD REPLYlink written 8 months ago by pixie@bioinfo1.4k

If these are from different experiments, then that's a whole different box of questions. Normalising cross experiment is far from trivial, and can only be done in some cases. The big caveat for WGCNA is that you need a decent number (>20) of samples to get interpretable output.

If these are cross experiment, then I'd recommend that you do WGCNA per condition agnostic of one another, then compare / contrast after you've generated modules.

If you're worried about covariates, or there's a strong effect that you want to account for, you could always take the residuals from a model fit (check out the removeBatchEffects function in Limma). Word of warning though, you're then going down the road of a lot of statistical caveats, make sure you truly understand the consequences of each step.

ADD REPLYlink written 8 months ago by andrew.j.skelton735.7k

Thanks so much for your time and detailed explanation. I will give a proper thought to this before I jump into network analysis.

ADD REPLYlink written 8 months ago by pixie@bioinfo1.4k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1424 users visited in the last hour