Question: Clarification of OMA tree metrics
0
gravatar for samche42
11 months ago by
samche420
samche420 wrote:

Hi!

I've used OMA 2.2.0 standalone to generate an estimated species tree from 34 genomes. The tree was successfully generated but I can't seem to find any explanations for the numbers on the tree. Are the node numbers the bootstrap values? Levels of similarity? And the scale bar? Is that a reflection of site substitutions? Difference between HOGs of some sort? I'm so sorry if this is a fundamental question but my googling has failed me.

Thanks in advance for anyone out there that could help me out! :)

species tree oma orthologs • 310 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 3 months ago by Biostar ♦♦ 20 • written 11 months ago by samche420
1
gravatar for adrian.altenhoff
11 months ago by
Switzerland
adrian.altenhoff620 wrote:

Hi,

I assume you refer the tree in Output/EstimatedSpeciesTree.nwk (or since OmaStandalone 2.3.0 also in phyloxml format). The numbers are branch lengths in PAM (point accepted mutations).

This tree is a relative crude estimate of the underlying species tree but usually good enough for us to infer Hierarchical Orthologous Groups (HOGs) which need a guide tree. The main problem there is if it is wrongly rooted.

If you would like to estimate a good quality species tree we suggest to use the OMAGroups as marker genes and build a tree from a super matrix of them. We provide in Output/OrthologousGrpupsFasta/ for each marker gene a fasta file with unaligned sequences, so you can build MSAs with your favorite tool, build a supermatrix and estimate a phylogenetic tree with your method of choice.

Regards Adrian

ADD COMMENTlink written 11 months ago by adrian.altenhoff620

Thank you!! i really appreciate the help :)

ADD REPLYlink written 11 months ago by samche420
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 2375 users visited in the last hour