Question: Mauve alignment vs samtools for SNP calling
gravatar for gabriel.jabud
4 days ago by
United States
gabriel.jabud0 wrote:

If I have two assembled genomes (one reference), what is the difference between doing SNP calling using something like Samtools from the raw Illumina reads and doing a Mauve alignment after assembly of each genome? Would Samtools be much more accurate? It seems easier to just do a Mauve alignment and extract the SNPs since I've already done the assemblies but maybe this is oversimplifying it. These are bacterial genomes if that matters.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 4 days ago by jrj.healey11k • written 4 days ago by gabriel.jabud0
gravatar for jrj.healey
4 days ago by
United Kingdom
jrj.healey11k wrote:

You should use the reads and samtools if you have them. Part of identifying SNPs etc is determining how well they're supported (i.e. are they real or sequencing errors for instance). If you aligned 2 genomes with mauve, firstly it will be horribly inaccurate as you say, but also you'll have no information about whether that SNP is supported in most or all of the reads covering that position.

ADD COMMENTlink written 4 days ago by jrj.healey11k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1703 users visited in the last hour