Question: Synthetic construct and cloning vector contamination in scaffolds
gravatar for Bio22
4 weeks ago by
Bio220 wrote:

Hi folks,

As a beginner, I am still not familiar with the roles of this amazing and informative community, so sorry if I could not introduce my question in a proper way.

I got Illumina high seq reads of bacterial isolate, removed adapters and low quality reads using trimmomatic, and performed the assembly using spades, then scaffolding using MEDUSA platform, with several references. I then used NCBI VecScreen, to see whether I have contamination. The screening results showed me possible Synthetic construct and cloning vector contamination in my scaffolds.

I am wondering whether we can trust VecScreen!, and is there any pipeline or software to remove this contamination!!!

ADD COMMENTlink written 4 weeks ago by Bio220

If you just did a standard Illumina library it seems unlikely that there will be a vector contaminating the assembly. Are those cross hits coming from plasmid(s) your bacteria had that may be leading to these false positive hits with VecScreen?

ADD REPLYlink written 4 weeks ago by genomax87k

Hi @genomax

The library (NexteraXT ) was prepared by the sequencing company. Adapters were removed in previous step... I checked my scaffolds using ( PlasmidFinder-2.0 Server), because I thought as you mentioned, may they are just bacteria endogenous plasmids. However, Plasmidfinder showed me no hits = no plasmids.

I am confused because In my project I sequenced 2 bacteria at the same time, same process. while this one showed me this contamination, the second one' scaffolds were clean !!

ADD REPLYlink modified 4 weeks ago • written 4 weeks ago by Bio220
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 635 users visited in the last hour