Demuxbyname.sh dual index problem
0
0
Entering edit mode
3.7 years ago
damt0320 • 0

Hi, im trying to demultiplex a fastq file with demuxbyname.sh. Im using the following code:

demuxbyname.sh in=1-1_S1_L001_R1_001.fastq in2=1-1_S1_L001_R2_001.fastq out=out_%_R1.fq out2=out_%_R2.fq names=pool1.txt substringmode=t  delimiter=:

My samples are dual index (barcode in forward and barcode in reverse file). So in the txt file i have the 2 barcodes per ID in the first line (something like ACTCCCG+GTCGGG) and the other ones below like in a column. The fastq files are like the following:

@M03485:29:000000000-J4R9F:1:1101:16497:1353 1:N:0:NCCGGAGA+TATAGCCT
GCCACTAGATCCAAGAGATCCGNTGTTGNAAGTTGTATTTCCAAAATAACCCAAATAATACATTCCATTTAAGAGTTTATAAATAAAATGAAGATCAAGGGGACAATAATAAAAAAGAAAGAGAATACACTCTTCCCTCTTAAACCCTTCTTGACTTCACAAAGTTCACAGGTGTGTAAAGGATGAAAAGTTAATTA$
+
3AA33FCFBFFFFGGGGAGGGG#BBFFG#B2AFFHHHHFFHFBHHGFHHHEEFHHHHHHFFHEGGHFGHHHHHHF5FGHHHHHGHGHDF3@FHFGFHHBGGCEEGHHHHHHHFFFE?FHHHHHHHHFBGHHHHHGGCHCCFFHHGHGGHHGHFHFFHHHFHGCFFFGHHHHHFFDDGHFBFHFGHHHGHHDFHFGFG$
@M03485:29:000000000-J4R9F:1:1101:16985:1388 1:N:0:NCCGGAGA+TATAGCCT
ACTGACTGATGCAAGAGATCCGNTGTTGNAAGTGAACCTTGTTACGACTTTTACTTCCGTATAGTAAGTAGATCGGAAGAGCACACGGCTGAACTCCAGTCACTCCGTAGAATCTCGGATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTGAAAAAAATCAAATATTATGCTTCGCAGATTTCAAACCCGGACCCTTTGTTACGACTTTTCCT$

The program dont show any error, i just dont get any output from the process

Set INTERLEAVED to false
Input is being processed as paired
Time:               3.899 seconds.
Reads Processed:    6470118     1659.47k reads/sec
Bases Processed:    1623999618  416.53m bases/sec
Reads Out:          0
Bases Out:          0

IN another post, the issue was fixed with substringmode=t but not in this case. Any help is appreciated.

demultiplex demuxbyname.sh bbmap dual-index • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Can you run the code I have in this post to make sure you get a list of all indexes that are in your file: C: Demultiplexing reads with index present in the labels

You may need to rev-comp indexes you are searching with and you would get that idea once you see what is there.

You could also try deML (A: Demultiplexing Illumina data ) as an alternative.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2908 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6