Question: Gene set enrichment analysis
0
gravatar for Rob
7 weeks ago by
Rob30
Rob30 wrote:

Hi friends I am doing gene set enrichment analysis with GSEA java base software from broad institute. I have 44 patients (2 groups: 22 control vs 22 treatment) and 19000 genes. How should I interpret the result? No gene has FDR less than 0.05. Why is this? there should be some significant genes but there is not.

gene • 183 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 7 weeks ago by Rob30
1

there should be some significant genes but there is not.

Why do you expect an effect? Do you have independent evidence for it? Is it known that the treatment affects gene expression?

No gene has FDR less than 0.05.

I assume you mean that none of the FDR-adjusted p-values are below 0.05. All that this result says is that by accepting no more than 5% false positives, you don't find any enriched gene. That's what you can conclude from this experiment. However, there's nothing special in using the value 0.05. You should set the value based on circumstances and the cost associated with making a mistake. I've happily used 0.1 when the purpose was to find candidates for follow-up experiments. Another approach is simply to rank the genes by magnitude of the effect and pick the top x for validation. For example choose x based on how many genes your resources allow you to test in independent experiments. Occasionally one may be in a "pathological" case of p-value distribution. This can be detected by plotting a histogram of the uncorrected p-values. See here for more details.

ADD REPLYlink modified 7 weeks ago • written 7 weeks ago by Jean-Karim Heriche24k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1095 users visited in the last hour
_