Question: Has Anyone Used Clcbio (Genomics Workbench) For Doing De Novo Assembly And Finding Differentially Expressed Genes?
2
gravatar for Nebo
8.5 years ago by
Nebo80
Ubana - IL USA
Nebo80 wrote:

Our lab got a trial of the CLCbio Genomics software and we are using it to do de novo assembly in sugarcane RNA-seq data as well as analyzing the differentially expressed genes between two genotypes, contrasting to the response to drought. The software is very user friendly and easy to use, but I'd like to know if is as reliable as the other softwares commonly used for these analyses. Thanks since now.

gene software denovo • 4.1k views
ADD COMMENTlink written 8.5 years ago by Nebo80
3
gravatar for Leszek
8.5 years ago by
Leszek4.0k
IIMCB, Poland
Leszek4.0k wrote:

I've tried CLC package and I agree it's straightforward to use. Graphical interface is helping a lot in case of inexperienced user. However, if you have bioinformatician in your lab I would recommend using free software ie. Velvet for de novo assembly and cufflinks pipeline for differential expression analyses. First of all, both packages are highly configurable, regularly updated and often offer more features than commercial tools. Secondly, these tools has been published, well documented and widely tested. Finally, most of the research in the field are done this way nowadays, but of course you will need trained technician/researcher.

For my data (~20Mb fungal genomes) I found Velvet performing much better than CLC. Moreover data managment sometimes is a pain with CLC. Of course, another assemblers might perform better depending on various scenarios.

ADD COMMENTlink written 8.5 years ago by Leszek4.0k

You are right regarding the publication matter. Are you aware of any publication that analyzed the data using only CLC? All I could find used different softwares or used CLC and compared the results with the other methods.... I'm considering doing both, using CLC and the most common methods, then compare their results...

ADD REPLYlink written 8.5 years ago by Nebo80
2
gravatar for Ketil
8.5 years ago by
Ketil4.0k
Germany
Ketil4.0k wrote:

We have used CLC as one of the tools for de novo assembly. With our data, it performed OK with Illumina data (and better than any other de Bruijn assembler we tried), but didn't do as well as Newbler for 454 data. We're still not entirely done yet, though.

Edit: this is from de novo genome assembly --- I missed that your question was concerning transcriptome sequencing.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 8.5 years ago • written 8.5 years ago by Ketil4.0k

thanks.I also have Illumina data and it seems to perform ok as well, but since I didnt have a background on the software yet, I was afraid about its acceptance...

ADD REPLYlink written 8.5 years ago by Nebo80
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 754 users visited in the last hour