Local alignment with bowtie2
0
0
Entering edit mode
2.3 years ago
pooryamb • 0

Dear All,

I need to align many sequences against a single reference sequence locally. And I need the ungapped alignment. I ran the bowtie2 with the following options;

bowtie2 --local --rdg 1000,1000 --rfg 1000,1000 -x $myDatabase -f -U $FastaOfSequences -S $SamOutput

I have set gap opening and extension penalties to 1000 so that the alignments will not have any gap in between.

When I look at the sam output, I see some sequences that share a stretch of > 60 nt with the target sequence, but bowtie2 has not mapped them!

When I remove gap penalty options (--rdg 1000,1000 --rfg 1000,1000), the mentioned problem does not happen. However, some of the alignments have a gap in between. I am surprised that many of my sequences map with target when I use the default gap penalties but not with the increased gap penalties. While, there is no gap in their alignment (with default parameters)! It is odd because I expected that by increasing the gap penalty, I would get rid of alignments with gaps in between, but it also removes some ungapped alignments.

Later, I tried lowering gap penalties (--rdg 100,100 --rfg 100,100). It worked perfectly and output gapless alignments.

Yet, the question is why bowtie2 comes up with this problem when high gap penalties are used.

I would appreciate it if anyone could double-check this issue. I have copied one of the query sequences and my target sequence. This is my query:

TTATATTTTTTTTTGACAAGCCTTCCTATTATTCTTTTATATATAAATTGATAATAAC TGTGTTAAAAAAAAAATATATTAAATAAAATATAAAAATAATAAATAAATATAAATAA TATTAATAATATAAATTTAAATTATATAATTTAGAAATAGTTTTGTTTTTATTTTGGT TTTATAAAATGTTTTTTCTATGTCTTGTGTGCTTAAG

This is my target (that you need to index it before searching the query against it):

TTTTATATTTTTTTTTGACAAGCCTTCCTATTATTCTTTT ATATATAAATTGATAATAACTGTGTTAAACAAAACTGATT ATTTTGATAATAAAATATACTATATGATAATATATCGTAA TTATATAATGATCCGAATATATCAAAATATAATGATAAAA ATAAAAAATCTTTTAAAAAAAAACTAAAAAATGATATAAT AAATAA
local_alignent bowtie2 • 1.6k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Could you give a concrete example of ungapped mapping, when you remove the high gap penalties?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

This is really weird behaviour. The only way I can think this happening is that after the contiguous (ungapped) match since there are still nucleotides in the Query seq, it is trying to open a gap (even to match a single nucleotide)

Case1: When the gap penalty is too high, then the total alignment score is so low of the gapped alignment that it becomes lower than the --score-min threshold, and somehow bowtie is giving up saying that no alignment is possible.

Case 2: The gap penalties are not very high; The --score-min threshold is not reached while opening the gap (even of 1-nucleotide), and so it is not giving up on the alignment. Rather, it is comparing the gapped with ungapped and finding that ungapped has a comparatively higher score, it finally is reporting the ungapped alignment

Though if this is happening, it is really a bug. Could you check if you reduce the --score-min to very small (lower than combined gap penalties), this problem persists or not?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I lowered the --score-min, but it did not work. I also played with --score-min while using default gap penalties. With default gap penalties, when I lowered --score-min, two cases happened: if I lowered it too much, it did not align at all. However, if the decrease was moderate, it mapped the query to multiple sites of the target.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for checking the --score-min. I see a problem in lowering this score as what is happening is that if the threshold is too low, now it is possible to "cheaply" mismatch rather than opening a gap. And since there are many different ways to permute and combine mismatches, without probably changing the overall alignment score, it is showing too many alignments.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2317 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6