Pseudobulk model design: account for both capture and individuals hashed within capture?
0
0
Entering edit mode
9 months ago
Derrik ▴ 40

I have some single-cell data I want to analyze in DESeq2 with a model of interaction terms of treatment and time variables. See the image for the metadata of samples I have. The data comes from several hashed captures, each with 2 samples. I wanted to model the capture to account for batch effects, but I've tried several permutations and keep getting linear combinations of terms. Is there a way to model both the individual and the capture it came from? Note that the same 2 individuals are always paired in a capture.

My thought for the model was something like this:

~ 0 + cluster_labels + condition:ind.condition.ID + timepoint:cap.timepoint.ID + condition * timepoint

The model works if I don't include the timepoint:cap.timepoint.ID term. Cluster labels isn't shown in the metadata table, but it's the celltypes (CM, TFH, etc.). One capture failed, so there are 6 captures for the 'pre' timepoint and 5 for the 'post'.

Metadata

pseudobulk linear-modeling DESeq2 RNA-seq • 289 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1208 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6