I am developing a program that softclips reads. When I run samtools view the_new_bam_created_with_my_softclipped_read.bam
I get this error message
MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10749:1220 0 chr2 208248363 60 24S77M25S * 0 0 CAAAATCACATTATTGCCAACATGACTTACTTGATCCCCATAAGCATGACGACCTATGATGATAGGTTTTACCCATCCACTCACAAGCCGGGGGATATTTTTGCAGATAATGGCTTCTCTGAAGAC AFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF[E::bam_read1] CIGAR and query sequence lengths differ for MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10753:13456
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF MD:Z:126 RG:Z:230824_MN01972_0051_A000H5KYKL_RACP1_4poolv7anddirect_A NM:i:0 UQ:i:0 AS:i:126
MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10753:13456 0 chr2 208248339 60 111M2D13M * 0 0 CAAAATCACATTATTGCCAACATGACTTACTTGATCCCCATAAGCATGACGACCTATGATGATAGGTTTTACCCATCCACTCACAAGCCGGGGGATATTTTTGCAGATAATCTTCTCTGAAGAC AFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAF MD:Z:111^GG13 RG:Z:230824_MN01972_0051_A000H5KYKL_RACP1_4poolv7anddirect_A NM:i:2 UQ:i:0 AS:i:116
samtools view: error reading file "softclipped.bam"
OK. When I check the read MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10753:13456 in the BAM file before done the softclipped I get an identical information
MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10753:13456 0 chr2 208248339 60 111M2D13M * 0 0 CAAAATCACATTATTGCCAACATGACTTACTTGATCCCCATAAGCATGACGACCTATGATGATAGGTTTTACCCATCCACTCACAAGCCGGGGGATATTTTTGCAGATAATCTTCTCTGAAGAC AFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAF MD:Z:111^GG13 RG:Z:230824_MN01972_0051_A000H5KYKL_RACP1_4poolv7anddirect_A NM:i:2 UQ:i:0 AS:i:116
I put both again but together to facilitate comparison
Before
MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10753:13456 0 chr2 208248339 60 111M2D13M * 0 0 CAAAATCACATTATTGCCAACATGACTTACTTGATCCCCATAAGCATGACGACCTATGATGATAGGTTTTACCCATCCACTCACAAGCCGGGGGATATTTTTGCAGATAATCTTCTCTGAAGAC AFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAF MD:Z:111^GG13 RG:Z:230824_MN01972_0051_A000H5KYKL_RACP1_4poolv7anddirect_A NM:i:2 UQ:i:0 AS:i:116
After
MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10753:13456 0 chr2 208248339 60 111M2D13M * 0 0 CAAAATCACATTATTGCCAACATGACTTACTTGATCCCCATAAGCATGACGACCTATGATGATAGGTTTTACCCATCCACTCACAAGCCGGGGGATATTTTTGCAGATAATCTTCTCTGAAGAC AFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAF MD:Z:111^GG13 RG:Z:230824_MN01972_0051_A000H5KYKL_RACP1_4poolv7anddirect_A NM:i:2 UQ:i:0 AS:i:116
Why does Samtools report an error in the first but not in the second read if they are identical and that particular read is ignored by my program?
In case the error message is confusing and the read in which the CIGAR and query sequence length differ is actually in the read where the error message appears (this one MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10749:1220 which was softclipped!)
I have also compared these two reads too.
Before
MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10749:1220 0 chr2 208248339 60 126M * 0 0 CAAAATCACATTATTGCCAACATGACTTACTTGATCCCCATAAGCATGACGACCTATGATGATAGGTTTTACCCATCCACTCACAAGCCGGGGGATATTTTTGCAGATAATGGCTTCTCTGAAGAC AFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF MD:Z:126 RG:Z:230824_MN01972_0051_A000H5KYKL_RACP1_4poolv7anddirect_A NM:i:0 UQ:i:0 AS:i:126
After
MN01972:51:000H5KYKL:1:11101:10749:1220 0 chr2 208248363 60 24S77M25S * 0 0 CAAAATCACATTATTGCCAACATGACTTACTTGATCCCCATAAGCATGACGACCTATGATGATAGGTTTTACCCATCCACTCACAAGCCGGGGGATATTTTTGCAGATAATGGCTTCTCTGAAGAC AFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF MD:Z:126 RG:Z:230824_MN01972_0051_A000H5KYKL_RACP1_4poolv7anddirect_A NM:i:0 UQ:i:0 AS:i:126
To the best of my knowledge, the read soft clipped looks correct. What am I missing?
There is something I wonder...
When looking at reads softclipped with ampliconclip I have seen that the MD tag is removed.
MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:11101:21047:5531 0 chr19 33302153 60 151M * 0 0 GCTGCCGGCTGTGCTGGAACAGGCCGGCCAGGAACTCGTCGTTGAAGGCGGCCGGGTCGATGTAGGCGCTGATGTCGATGGACGTCTCGTGCTCGCAGATGCCGCCCAGCGGCTCCGGGGCGGCAGGTGGGGCGGGAGGCTGCGCGGGGCC FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF/FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFF/FAFF/AFFFFFFFF/FFF/FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFAFF/F/FFFAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF= MD:Z:23T127 RG:Z:230817_MN01972_0049_A000H5KYMY_RACP1-4poolv7anddirect NM:i:1 UQ:i:14 AS:i:146
MN01972:49:000H5KYMY:1:11101:21047:5531 0 chr19 33302174 60 21S130M * 0 0 GCTGCCGGCTGTGCTGGAACAGGCCGGCCAGGAACTCGTCGTTGAAGGCGGCCGGGTCGATGTAGGCGCTGATGTCGATGGACGTCTCGTGCTCGCAGATGCCGCCCAGCGGCTCCGGGGCGGCAGGTGGGGCGGGAGGCTGCGCGGGGCC FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF/FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFFFFFF/FAFF/AFFFFFFFF/FFF/FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAFAFF/F/FFFAFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF= RG:Z:230817_MN01972_0049_A000H5KYMY_RACP1-4poolv7anddirect UQ:i:14 AS:i:146
Is this info involved in how the CIGAR is measured?? I doubt it becaouse this is optional.
Hi Istvan Albert. I have seen your answer. Many thanks
Regarding the mock question. I have found a solution to that problem. I will put the answer.
Regarding this question, I don't see the relationship. In this one, it seems that the length of the CIGAR and the actual length of the reads (the sequence and the quality one) are not the same but all are 126 and comparing the one after soft-clipping and before, it seems identical apart from the CIGAR and the tag. I am work on this all day.
ok I have added a function that checks CIGAR and query sequence lengths and if disagreement is detected, stop the analysis. In that read something is done wrong
I am still working on this (maybe this weekend or Monday). I will update you.