Should we update time periods in a Bibliometric analysis even after completing it, if it's found to be generating biased results due to recent study?

Question

[Md. Al - Mustanjid]

Suppose a bibliometric analysis was conducted to uncover new research discoveries, but it was later discovered that similar research had already been carried out. In such a scenario, what would be the appropriate course of action to pursue?

• Shall we update the time intervals?
• Should we update and rewrite both the findings and the article?

Please help with this, thanks in advance.

[Pierre Lindenbaum]

unrelated to bioinformatics. ask : https://academia.stackexchange.com/

[Md. Al - Mustanjid]

Sorry for this inconvenience.

[Pierre Lindenbaum]

This post does not fit the theme of this forum.

[Pierre Lindenbaum]

validate your previous questions that got correct answers (green mark on the left) : What are the differences between Gene Regulatory Network and Protein-Protein Interactions? ; What is the way of getting deferentially expressed genes from Gene expression Omnibus? ; Can I find common genes by comparing one disease's rna-seq dataset with another disease's microarray dataset? ; If I have a ran-seq data of disease A and also rna-seq for disease B on the same platform and If i extracted DEGs from both diseases and find common DEGs; is this analysis ok? ;