Question: Should we assemble/merge R1 and R2 reads from Illumina MiSeq of fungal ITS amplicon before further analysis?
1
gravatar for sentausa
4.0 years ago by
sentausa630
France
sentausa630 wrote:

Dear all,

 

 

I'm new in fungal ITS (internal transcribed spacer) metabarcoding analysis, so please ask if you don't understand my question.

Our lab received Illumina MiSeq sequencing result of our 150 samples from a company, but they give us only the R1 and R2 fastq files, without the consensus sequences. Our lab used to have 454 sequencing previously, and usually we get the consensus sequences. My question is, should we assemble those R1 and R2 into a consensus sequence before further analysis?

We have a pipeline for further analysis which is based on the 454 data, and I'm afraid that if we don't have consensus sequences beforehand, the R1 and R2 sequences would be recognized as two different ITS by the pipeline.

Any idea?

And thanks a lot in advance.

miseq its metagenomics assembly • 4.2k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.7 years ago by mikhail.shugay3.3k • written 4.0 years ago by sentausa630
3
gravatar for sentausa
3.7 years ago by
sentausa630
France
sentausa630 wrote:

After a few months, I've learnt one or two things about ITS analysis, and one of them is that R1 and R2 reads might be used without merging them beforehand. In fact, we might fail to identify many species using only the merged paired-reads (it’s pointed out in this paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12923, for example).

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.7 years ago by sentausa630
1
gravatar for 5heikki
4.0 years ago by
5heikki7.9k
Finland
5heikki7.9k wrote:

What's your fragment size? Do the pairs overlap? They should, if you knew what you were ordering. In this case, you should most definitely merge the pairs, QC the seqs, and proceed to OTU clustering and taxonomy assignments..

ADD COMMENTlink modified 4.0 years ago • written 4.0 years ago by 5heikki7.9k
0
gravatar for marina.v.yurieva
4.0 years ago by
Farmington, CT
marina.v.yurieva470 wrote:

If you are talking about QIIME pipeline, you should merge them. You can use Flash to do that. But check reads QC after that. You might have to trim them if quality is not very good. And double-check if the adapters are trimmed. Alternatively, you can use just one read but if you want to take an advantage of the PE then you should merge them. 

ADD COMMENTlink written 4.0 years ago by marina.v.yurieva470
0
gravatar for mikhail.shugay
3.7 years ago by
mikhail.shugay3.3k
Czech Republic, Brno, CEITEC
mikhail.shugay3.3k wrote:

More library structure details are needed, however I completely agree with sentausa. For example in this case

  ----  ---- read1
 ----  ----  read2
----  ----   read3
======       consensus1
      ====== consensus2
...******... region of interest (barcode)

only assembled consensus sequences can be overlapped, therefore pre-overlapping of reads can decrease barcode yield.

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.7 years ago by mikhail.shugay3.3k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1478 users visited in the last hour