Question: Low Coverage in Pathway Enrichment Analysis using DAVID
0
gravatar for hpw9
3.6 years ago by
hpw90
United States
hpw90 wrote:

From a list of 3000 significantly differentially expressed genes (from a universe of 20000 genes using RNAseq gene expression data), I used DAVID Functional Annotation to extract pathway and gene ontology enrichment. DAVID came up with GO_BP_FAT results using 73% of the genes, but the KEGG_PATHWAY output had only 5 pathways (p-value < 0.05) enriched using only 32% of the gene list.

What could cause this discrepancy in coverage between GO enrichment and Pathway enrichment? Any ideas on how to get better coverage from DAVID for kegg pathways? Or, are there superior platforms for deriving kegg enrichment? I was thinking about incorporating protein-protein interactions to build my gene list, but at that point I'd get too close to the total gene universe.

david analysis pathway • 1.7k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.6 years ago by Zhilong Jia1.4k • written 3.6 years ago by hpw90
1
gravatar for Zhilong Jia
3.6 years ago by
Zhilong Jia1.4k
London
Zhilong Jia1.4k wrote:

I will recommend enrichr, there are PPI gene set and pathway gene set, together with many others (see the link above.)

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.6 years ago by Zhilong Jia1.4k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1282 users visited in the last hour