Question: Criteria for identifying tandem and segmental duplicates
1
gravatar for kozhaki.seq
5.7 years ago by
kozhaki.seq60
Korea, Republic Of
kozhaki.seq60 wrote:

There are previous reports available on the estimated  tandem and segmental  duplicated genes (TDs and SDs) in rice ( http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063551). But I am not sure about the  reliability of  the data.Hence,I would like to analyze TDs and SD genes (not blocks) in rice.

Here, I am unable to make a criteria for TD and SD estimation (a condition which gives better reliable data). I noticed different groups used their-own criteria. For ex,  the previous work uses "identity was > = 30% and the alignment covered > = 70% of the protein length" for TD. In other work, > 94% identity is used for SD (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179966/)

1. Can anyone give suggestion before my analysis? I mean a cut off for TDs and SDs identification separately.

2. If anyone know a software suit which deals such duplicated genes estimation, it would be helpful. (FYI: I found some published suits, but the webpage is not working).

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

ADD COMMENTlink modified 5.3 years ago by Hranjeev1.5k • written 5.7 years ago by kozhaki.seq60
0
gravatar for Hranjeev
5.3 years ago by
Hranjeev1.5k
Malaysia
Hranjeev1.5k wrote:

The typical criteria that defines a segmental duplication is that the sequence is at least 1kb and 90% identical to the duplicate.

ADD COMMENTlink written 5.3 years ago by Hranjeev1.5k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1829 users visited in the last hour