Mapping Issues with Bowtie2
0
0
Entering edit mode
6.0 years ago
Varun Gupta ★ 1.2k

Hi Everyone,

I have a chimeric seq read data set, where in a read, one part of the read belongs to one region in the genome and other part belongs to the other region. I am using BOWTIE2 for mapping this read data set in local mode so that later on I can map the soft clipped part separately.

I am selecting seed length of 8 (-L 8), and I want to have 1 mismatch in it. I specified my parameters like this

Case1

bowtie2 -a -L 8 -N 1 -p 12 --local -x /user/index -U test.fastq -S test_L8_N1.sam

I get this as output

45728414 reads; of these:
  45728414 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    34402970 (75.23%) aligned 0 times
    7019150 (15.35%) aligned exactly 1 time
    4306294 (9.42%) aligned >1 times
24.77% overall alignment rate

Then I used this:

Case2

bowtie2 -a -L 8 -p 12 --local -x /user/index -U test.fastq -S test_L8_N0.sam (-N 0 is the default in local mode)

I get this as output

45728414 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    30962101 (67.71%) aligned 0 times
    8461008 (18.50%) aligned exactly 1 time
    6305305 (13.79%) aligned >1 times
32.29% overall alignment rate

As you see the alignment %age gets increased. Also I looked for XM:i:2 in case 1 and found only 1 XM:i:2 read, but in case2 a lot of them. Why??

I want to allow one mismatch in seed region (-L 8) and then other mismatches in the total alignment of the read, but I am confused by the 2 results above??

Any explanation as to why this result?

Regards

Varun

 

 

bowtie2 chimera • 2.0k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Sorry I can't help specifically with bowtie2 parameters, but perhaps your job would be better suited to Subread, which has in-built fusion detection capability.

http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/subread/

Detect fusions in genomic DNA sequencing data:

subread-align --reportFusions -d 50 -D 600 -i my_index -r reads1.txt -R reads2.txt 
-o subread_results.sam

 

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

It should be exactly the other way around, are sure you did not mix up which one is which?

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1605 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6